Laserfiche WebLink
. . <br /> • Y �.! <br /> � Cit� o� ORONO � <br /> � RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL <br /> • <br /> NO. 1300 <br /> - <br /> A RESOLUTION DENYING AN "AFTER <br /> THE FACT" VARIANCE APPLICATION <br /> OF JOHN C. ERICSON FOR MAJOR <br /> • STRUCTUR.AL REPAIR TO A NON CON- <br /> FORMING STRUCTURE ON PROPERTY <br /> LOCATED AT 1620 SHADYWOOD ROAD <br /> WHEREAS, the City of Orono is a municipal corporation organized <br /> under the laws of the State of Minnesota; and <br /> WHEREAS, pursuant to State Statute 412 et. seq. and 462 et. seq. <br /> the City Council of the City of Orono has adopted zoning regulations for <br /> the protection of the public health, safety and general welfare; and <br /> WHEREAS, John C. Ericson has applied for an "after the fact" <br /> variance for major structural repair done without a building permit on <br /> a pagota, a non conforming structure, located 15' from the lakeshore; and <br /> WHEREAS, the pagota, hereinafter refered to as structure, is <br /> located on a property legally described as lots 3, 4 and the south 5 <br /> • feet of lot 2, Shady-wood, hereinafter referred to as the property; and <br /> WHEREAS, the City Council has reviewed the application; the <br /> recommendation of staff and the Planning Commission; and comments made <br /> by the applicant. , � <br /> NOW, THERFORE BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City <br /> of Orono hereby denies the "after the �fact" variance application of John <br /> C. Ericson�.to permit major structural repairs to a non conforming struc- <br /> ture based on one or more of the following findings of fact: <br /> 1) �he prop,erty is located within the LR-1C zoning <br /> district requiring a minimum of 21, 780 sf of <br /> lot area. The property consists of approximately <br /> 34, 375 sf. The zoning district requires 100 ' of <br /> lot width; the property is 12°5' wide. <br /> 2) On May 4, 1981, a stop work order was issued to <br /> the applicant for work done on a lakeshore struc- <br /> ture without a building permit. The following <br /> alterations were observed: <br /> a) The upper section of the structure was jacked <br /> above the top of the lakeshore bank. <br /> b) The old foundation had been removed and replaced <br /> with a slab of insufficient thickness. <br /> � c) There were no frost. footings. <br /> d) There were no foundation walls between the 1eve1. <br /> of the slab and the underside of the wooden <br /> second story. � � <br />