Resolution 1300 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

. ,' ,. E�3.cson Page 2 _ � C�t� of ORONO _ • RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL . • NO. 1300 • � • • ,,�... , ) The proposed improvement to the structure is major structural repair. 4) Ordinance 31. 108 does not permit structural repair of a non conforming structure. 5) If the directive of Ordinance 31. 108 had been - followed, the applicant would have been made aware of the alternatives available to him at the time of the required staff inspection as . � follows: a) If the structure could have been repaired , by simple repair (no structural alterations) this could have been done with a building permit. b) If deterioration of the structure was so severe that removal of the structure is required and applicant is made aware that replacement permits cannot be issued, Ericson could have had the use and benefit • of the structure for a few more years until it failed. 6) The structural repairs proposed for the structure will require approval of new building work within 7•5 ft. of the shoreline; Ordinance 34. 201 does not permit this. 7) The proposed major repairs to the structure would perpetuate 234 sf of hardcover within the 75 ft. setback area of the lakeshore which is . not allowed per Ordinance 34. 202 . 8) The complete replacement of the foundation of . the structure will extend the life of a non conforming structure; approval of this action would be contrary to the intent and objectives of Ordinan�ce 31. 108. � 9) Ordinance 31. 10G would require the removal of the structure for the assessor' s records show the fair market value of the structure at $1, 170. 00 in 1976. ' 10) The applicant was in violation of section 69 B . 020 of the Municipal Code when he raised and jacked the building without a permit. The work required • a licensed housemover. �