Laserfiche WebLink
MINUTES OF THE RECONVENED BOARD OF REVIEW MEETING <br />HELD MAY 9, 1994 <br />ROLL <br />The Bt>ard of Review mel on the above dale with the following members present- Mayor <br />Edward Callahan. CiHincilmembers J. Diann Goetten. Charles Kelley and JoEllen Hurr. The <br />folU>wihg represented City suff: City Administrator Ron Moorse, City Assessors Rolf Erickson <br />and Dave Wilde, and City Recorder Lin Vcc. Mayor Callahan called the meeting to order at <br />7:02 p.m. <br />Mayor Callahan explained that the City As.sesst)rs have contacted the 51 property owners who <br />had asked for reconsideration of their 1995 property valuations. Discussion will proceed as the <br />property owners had signed in and then any properties the Council wishes to further discuss will <br />be added. <br />Charles Percival. 2732 Caroline Avemie. 20-117-23 24 0041. Mayor Callahan noted the <br />Assessor ’s recommendation had been reduced by $30,000 with much of the adjustment related <br />to the building. Percival still does not feel he is being equitably assessed compared to the <br />adjacent homes. The land values are reasonable for all four adjacent properties but the building <br />values range from $78/s.f. to $ll8/s.f. He believed the Smith house on Casco, which the <br />Assessor fell was comparable, was valued at $105/s.f. Erickson commented that there are many <br />variables that determine tte cost per square foot, including finished basements, fireplaces, <br />bathrooms, garages and quality of the house. Ltxiking at the gross living area is not a <br />comparable value. Percival wi>uld be willing to accept the value of $ 105/s.f. which is supposed <br />to be the highest quality of the Casco Point home yet his home is valued at $118/s.f. Erickson <br />stated Percival’s house was a better quality home than the Smith home and the value calculated <br />out to $l 10/s.f. Valuations arc based on comparable sales, not comparable neighboring homes. <br />It was moved by Hurr, seconded by Goetten, to continue with the reduced recommendation of <br />the Assessor at $666,700. Ayes 4, nays 0. <br />Harvey Reder. 3598 Livingston Avenue. 17-117-23 43 0034, commented on three items that <br />may not have been considered by the Assessors: 1) Zoning district is 1/2 acre and his property <br />is less than 1/2 acre; 2) No heat to the top flot>r; 3) In the west side yard, the strucnire is too <br />close to Blaine Avenue which is a problem under new code. He felt the valuation to be about <br />10% t(Hi high. He wished he had appealed last year’s valuation as he felt that was too high even <br />though there was little change for the 1995 valuation. Erickson stated that the off-lake property <br />type increased 1.4% as a whole. The overall lakeshore class increased 8.6%. Reder’s property <br />was actually valued $100 less than the 1994 valuation. <br />It was moved by Goetten, seconded by Kelley, to use the Assessor ’s recommended value of <br />$65,000. Ayes 4, nays 0. <br />I