My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
05-09-1994 Reconvened Board of Review Minutes
Orono
>
City Council
>
Agenda Packets - Historical
>
1990-1996 Microfilm
>
1994 Board of Review
>
05-09-1994 Reconvened Board of Review Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/8/2023 11:52:30 AM
Creation date
12/8/2023 11:52:26 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
5
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
MINUTES OF THE REC0N\T:NED BOARD OF RJ*ME\V MEETING <br />HELD MAY 9. 1994 <br />John C. Ericson. 1620 Shadvwood Road. 17-117-23 21 0012. Mated he received a letter fn>m <br />ita Assessor recommending nt> change from the valuation of $261,000. He felt the land value <br />went up too much at $21.000 and thougl * 3-4% was adequate. Erickstm suted the ira:rease was <br />about the same as other similar properties adding that some were adjusted closer to the channel. <br />Kelley asked how the Assessor arrived at an 11% average increase. Erickson replied that the <br />buildings were calculated with the new rates. In order to bring the property class up to the 93% <br />Hennepin County minimum, an iiKrease of 7% + would be required. Properties are then <br />reviewed by bays, value increments, etc. It was determined that the higher priced houses <br />probably were 10% low. Few of the higher priced homes sold si> the class was raised <br />across-the-bo.'ird. For example, on Park Drive a home sold for $292,000 in September of 1992 <br />and again in February of 1994 for $335,000. Ericson stated that he wanted to rebuild 6-7 years <br />ago and was turned down by Council. He then did some remodeling for which he was assessed. <br />He thought the off-lake properties should be assessed more rather that having 8-9% for lakeshore <br />vs. 1.4% for non-lakeshore. Erickson responded that there were years in the early 1980’s where <br />lakeshore properties were low. <br />It was moved by Hurr, seconded by Kelley, to approve the recommendation of the Assessor at <br />$261,000. Ayes 4. nays 0. <br />Delores Penipi^re 3540 North Shore Drive. 08-117-23 43 0011. slated the increase fnm <br />$81,000 to $95,000 in three years was xoo great. She noted the house was small and an unusual <br />shape. There is a road that cros.ses between the house and the lake. Oldtimers knew that <br />properties like this did ntH pay the same high taxes as those directly on the lake. Mayor <br />Callahan noted the increase was due to the land as in other properties. Hurr added the building <br />value actually decreased. Kelley thought a 50’ lot with a ro^ in front could be lowered to the <br />1994 valuation <br />It was moved by Callahan, seconded by Gixjtten, to accept the recommendation of the Assessor <br />at $95,000. Ayes 4, nays 0. <br />David Verville. 4209 North Shore Drive. 07-117-23 43 0005, stated his valuation went up <br />$10,(XX) which is a 7.5% increase and he thought that was Uvo much tor one year. He felt a 4% <br />increase was enough for one year. Mayor Callahan stated that as long as the general increase <br />falls within the range of the average, the Assessor’s recommendation should be equitable. <br />Verville stated that houses across the street from his (non-lakeshore) did not sell for more than <br />they did in 1986. He felt the lakeshore properties always received the laigest and first increases. <br />Erickson indicated the 1984 valuation was $121,000 on this property but went down to $110,000 <br />in 1985. Two years later the valuations were raised again but this followed the real estate <br />market. He stated that one way to approach the property increases is to talk to state legislators. <br />It was mc-ved by Mayor Callahan, seconded by Hurr, to accept the recommendation of the City <br />Assessor at $144,000. Ayes 4, nays 0.
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.