My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
06-19-1995 Planning Packet
Orono
>
Agendas, Minutes & Packets
>
Planning Commission
>
Packets
>
1990-1999
>
1995
>
06-19-1995 Planning Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/27/2023 3:33:30 PM
Creation date
9/27/2023 3:29:17 PM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
215
PDF
View images
View plain text
ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING <br />MINUTES FOR JUNE 19, 1995 <br />ROLL <br />The Orono Planning Commission met on the above date with the following members <br />present; Chair Stephen Peterron, Charles Schrocder, Sandra Smith, Dale Lindquist, <br />Candace Rowlette, Charles Nolan, Jr, and Janice Berg. The following represented the <br />City Staff: Building and Zoning Administrator Jeanne Mabusth and Recorder Sherry <br />Frost Council Member Goetten and Mayor Callahan were present. Chair Peterson called <br />the meeting to order at 7:00 p m <br />SCHEDULED PUBLIC HEARINGS/PUBLIC INFORMATION MEETING <br />(ilfl) #2025 MICHAEL PLANK, 4115/4145 WATERTOWN ROAD - <br />PRELIMINARY SUBDIVISION - 7:00-7:0* P.M. <br />The Certificate of Mailing and Affidavit of Publication were noted. <br />Mr Plank was represented by his surveyor, Mark Gronberg. <br />The sketch plan was reviewed at the last Planning Commission meeting. The applicant <br />followed the recci^u'iendations for the preliminary subdivision. The road outlot has been <br />platted. There is no back lot reconfiguration. Lot 2 does not have to meet 150% of area <br />and width standards. A width variance will be required for Lot 2 adjacent to cul-de-sac. <br />Septic testing revealed adequate soils for on-site ahemate site location. The applicant was <br />informed that if Lot I was subdivided in the future that the northern lot would no longer <br />be able to access from Watertown Road. An upgraded road was asked for if the three lot <br />subdivision were to be done <br />The applicant's representative inquired if the current standards at the time of future <br />subdivision do not ask for an upgrade, if the applicant could go to what the standards say <br />at that time <br />The loss of trees were discussed. Mabusth said this would be looked at when Lot I was <br />further subdivided. Smith asked what the future desire for the property is according to the <br />applicant His representative said Plank would like to subdivide the remaining property <br />into two lots at some future date. Plank was reported to say he has no objection to the <br />requirements but wants it open to what the staiKlards are at that time. <br />During public comments, Mark Jones, a Realtor with Burnet Realty, said the 6 acres with <br />the house has been sold contingent upon approval of the subdivision.
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).