My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
06-19-1995 Planning Packet
Orono
>
Agendas, Minutes & Packets
>
Planning Commission
>
Packets
>
1990-1999
>
1995
>
06-19-1995 Planning Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/27/2023 3:33:30 PM
Creation date
9/27/2023 3:29:17 PM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
215
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
KHNUTES OF THE ORONO PLANNING COMNilSSION <br />MEETING HELD ON JUNE 19, 1995 <br />V «• » * • Ms sX • *«. M mm « y <br />Commissioners agreed that changes to the plans were made as asked. Mabusth noted a <br />newly defined designated wetland on the property. Mabusth commented that a vacation <br />of the utility and drainage easement on the old shared lot tine w ould be asked for when <br />fiuther division occurs. <br />Lindquist moved. Smith seconded, to approve Application #2025 with the Staff <br />recomnrendations 1-4, and with the understandimt that if Lot I is subdivided, it willj be <br />subject to the standards and ordinances at that time. Ayes 6, Nays 0 <br />(#2) #2029 WILLIAM F. SMITH, 25S0 FOX STREET - PRELIMINARY <br />SUBDIVISION • 7:50-8:30 P.M. <br />The Certificate of Mailing and Affidavit of Publication were noted. <br />Mr. Smith was present <br />At the last meeting of the commission. Smith was asked to gain access to the newly <br />created lot from Fox Run. Four property owners have sent letters voicing their opposition <br />to the use of this access The applicant's subdivision proposal requests the use of the <br />existing easement drivewav to serve all three lots It was noted that there is 2+ acres of <br />drv contiguous land to the west of the driveway. Mabusth said another alternative <br />suggested at the sketch olan review would be to allow a second curb cut to serve the new <br />lot, but that would conflict with the City's comprdtensive management plan for rural areas. <br />An earlier subdivision stipulated a disclaimer that if an additional lot was created, a private <br />road would be needed to serve 3 lots. To satisfv the current code, a 24' wide paved road <br />would be needed with a cul-de-sac within the only area available, a designated wetland. <br />Mabusth said if division was considered a back lot/front lot configuration, an outlot at 30' <br />width could be installed along the east lot line Lot 2 would have to continue using the <br />existing drive. There would be minimal encroachment of the designated wetland. <br />The applicant would like the Commission to recommend using the existing driveway for <br />the lot. Smith has added 4" of new gravel, which has already conformed to the ruts. The <br />applicant will bring in a blade to cut the drive to make it uniform and then crown it for <br />proper drainage. Smith said this would be done to all of the drivewav and the turnaround <br />areas. <br />Mabusth noted that the on-site septic tests confirm suitable area for septic treatment on <br />Lot 2. There would be contiguous 2-acre of dry land to west of easement drive that <br />intersc'cts Lot 2. <br />"t <br />i <br />I ->»rr >i|• Mr'l.
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.