Laserfiche WebLink
ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING <br />MINUTES FOR APRIL 21, 1997 <br />• <br />ROLL <br />The Orono Planning Commission met on the above date with the following members <br />present: Chair Dale Lindquist, Charles Schroeder, Sandra Smith, Janice Berg, Elizabeth <br />Hawn, William Stoddard, and Lili McMillan. The following represented the City Staff: <br />Assistant Zoning and Planning Administrator Michael Gaffron, Public Services Director <br />Greg Gappa, City Planner Elizabeth Van Zomeren, and Recorder Sherry Frost. Mayor <br />Jabbour and Council Member Goetten were present. Chair Lindquist called the meeting to <br />order at 7:00 p.m. <br />SCHEDULED PUBLIC HEARINGS/PUBLIC INFORMATION REVIEWS <br />( #1) 7:00 P.M. TELECOMMUNICATIONS ORDINANCE - 7:00 -7:30 P.M. <br />The Affidavit of Publication and Certificate of Mailing were noted. <br />Van Zomeren reported that the proposed telecommunications ordinance was amended <br />from discussions held at the March Planning Commission Meeting. Antennas structures <br />were deleted from the ordinance. The policy was codified to allow PCS on municipal <br />water towers. This would limit the use to the two existing water towers, one near the City <br />• offices and the other in Navarre. Van Zomeren said she understood that the maximum <br />distance antennas may be located is 4 miles which is the distance between these two water <br />towers. She also noted that antennas can be co- located on the same tower. A maximum <br />of three providers can co- locate on one tower with antennas placed at different heights. <br />Van Zomeren indicated if problems occur due to these locations in the future, the issue <br />can be revisited at that time. <br />Antennas are further defined within the amendment specifying PCS, radio receivers, and <br />ham radio antennas. The public service antenna description did not include PCS. Van <br />Zomeren brought attention to the conditions noted on pages 3 and 4 of the memo <br />regarding setbacks and color compatibility. She indicated the language of the ordinance <br />was reviewed with a consultant. Van Zomeren said drafts of the ordinance were faxed to <br />interested parties. <br />During public comments, Tom Alexander, attorney for Larkin, Hoffman, and representing <br />APT (American Portable Telecommunications), reported having attended the prior <br />meeting and reiterated what he saw to be the issues. He is of the belief the ordinance <br />would restrict instead of expand the Telecommunications Act. He said the removal of the <br />conditional use prohibits towers from being built by placement of antennas only on the <br />two existing water towers. Alexander believes the restriction is illegal under the <br />Telecommunications Act. <br />• <br />