Laserfiche WebLink
, , <br /> , � <br /> Christine Mattson <br /> From: Christine Mattson <br /> Sent: Friday, January 28, 2011 10:51 AM <br /> To: 'Kris Rudd' <br /> Subject: RE: Rudd 601 Park Lane <br /> Kris, <br /> I understand you have a copy of what you believe is the "final survey". This is not consistent with the approved <br /> plan on file with the City. The resolution which was recorded with Hennepin County and filed with the chain of <br /> title is the final approved plan in the City's opinion (previously attached). This survey is attached to the <br /> resolution document you signed following the Council approval. Based on documentation in our file, this is the <br /> correct and final approved plan. Staff does not have the discretion to agree with you and allow the building to <br /> remain based on your survey. In short, because it is not in compliance, the shed must be removed by May 1, <br /> 2011. <br /> If you would like to appeal staff's interpretation of this document before the Council you must submit a letter in <br /> writing to Melanie Curtis along with $100 appeal fee. Your letter must be received two weeks prior to the <br /> desired Council meeting date (Council meets the 2nd and 4th Mondays of each month), we would present your <br /> appeal letter to Council and staff would prepare a report. You will have an opportunity to speak directly to the <br /> Council about the situation. <br /> As I stated above, unfortunately staff does not have the authority to change the official plan and in our opinion <br /> the plan attached to the resolution is the official plan. <br /> Please let me know if you have any further questions. <br /> Christine Mattson <br /> Planning Assistant <br /> 952-249-4620 <br /> � / <br /> �i� ,M�ba� <br /> -----Original Message----- �� 1 � Y ' (� <br /> From. Kris Rudd [mailto.krisrudd@mchsi.com] '� �`` j/� <br /> Sent: Thursday, January 27, 2011 2:11 PM � <br /> To: Christine Mattson � \1 � (�i � <br /> Cc: Melanie Curtis �� � � " . <br /> Sub�ect: Re: Rudd 601 Park Lane S k� � �I� C�� <br /> �� � �3v - <br /> Christine, 1 <br /> As I believe I stated in my previous email to Melanie, the si � be <br /> the same as the 'final' survey in my files. To my understanc ,� qeen <br /> included in the resolution. I am attaching a copy of that surv .,�� areas that <br /> were removed. <br /> Looking through my files, it appears that on November 20, 200, .�.,e did an inspection prior to allowing us to <br /> proceed in pouring the footings. According to my husband, he and Bruce inspected the deck that was <br /> removed, as well as all of the brick walkways/patio portions that were removed. Our shed was in its present <br /> location when that inspection occurred. We never had intentions of removing our shed and I don't believe we <br /> would have been allowed to proceed in pouring our footings if our shed was suppose to be removed and we <br /> had not removed it. <br /> i <br />