Laserfiche WebLink
1� 1 <br /> It appears that similar to the confusion on which shed was actually ours, there has been additional confusion <br /> on which survey should have been used?! Please let me know if there is anything else I can do to help in <br /> clearing up the confusion. :-) <br /> Thank you! <br /> Kris Rudd <br /> 612-270-9749 <br /> -----Original Message ----- <br /> From: "Christine Mattson" <CMattson@ci.orono.mn.us> <br /> To: "krisrudd@mchsi.com" <krisrudd@mchsi.com> <br /> Cc: "Melanie Curtis" <MCurtis@ci.orono.mn.us> <br /> Sent: Wednesday, January 26, 2011 11:32:08 AM GMT-06:00 US/Canada Central <br /> Subject: FW: Rudd 601 Park Lane <br /> Kris, <br /> Thank you for the information you've provided. We agree that the deck indicated as "required to be removed" <br /> with the variance was removed. Thank you. We mistakenly confused the shed on your neighbor's property with <br /> the shed on your property which was also required to be removed. Your conversations with Melanie have <br /> resolved this confusion, thank you for your patience in this matter. However, the shed on your property still <br /> must be removed to be in compliance with Resolution No. 4952. The final survey governs the removals is the <br /> survey attached to Resolution No. 4952, labeled as Exhibit A. This survey reflects the deck and shed to be <br /> removed. Within the resolution itself, under Conclusions, Order and Conditions, #3, it states, "...structural <br /> removals as shown on Exhibit A..."Attached is a copy of the resolution and exhibit for your reference. <br /> We understand this time of year is not suitable for removal of such a structure, therefore will extend the <br /> compliance date to May 1, 2011. Please remove the shed on or before this date in order to avoid legal action. <br /> The property will be inspected after this date for compliance. Please contact Melanie or myself with any <br /> questions. <br /> Christine Mattson <br /> Planning Assistant <br /> 952-249-4620 <br /> 2 <br />