Laserfiche WebLink
S <br /> �Roger Peitso <br /> From: Roger Peitso <br /> Sent: Friday,August 12, 2016 7:47 AM <br /> To: 'Steve Gerber' <br /> Subject: RE:Alternate Septic Site <br /> Steve, <br /> The borings that were done were probably just for checking to see if the existing drainfield was code compliant. If you <br /> need someone find a site,you could use the person who did the Compliance inspection or there is a list of design <br /> professionals on the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency website. <br /> Roger <br /> From:Steve Gerber[mailto:swg.gerber@gmail.comJ <br /> Sent: Friday,August 12, 2016 727 AM <br /> To: Roger Peitso<rpeitso@ci.orono.mn.us> <br /> Subject: Re:Alternate Septic Site <br /> Hi Roger, <br /> I got your voicemail along with this email. <br /> The septic certification and compliance was done because the property was sold. We purchased this property in <br /> 2014. So it was ordered by the previous owner. <br /> Attached is a copy of one of the pages of the soil borings that was done. Can I assume that since there were two <br /> borings that an alternative site was tested? I called the person who did the perc test but he is out of the office <br /> until next Monday. <br /> thanks, <br /> Steve <br /> On Aug 11, 2016, at 4:29 PM, Roger Peitso<r�eitso�u,ci.orono.mn.us>wrote: <br /> Steve, <br /> I left you a message on your phone, I needed to know if you have had an alternate septic site identified <br /> for your property? <br /> City of Orono Code Sec. 58-47 Building Permit Applications requires that a alternate site is identified <br /> before a permit can be issued. I cannot find any paperwork in your street file and I don't know if you had <br /> one identified when you did your Compliance inspection but we need one identified now. <br /> Any question please give me a call. <br /> Sincerely <br /> City of Orono <br /> 1 <br />