My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Re: bridge/fence/neighbors
Orono
>
Property Files
>
Street Address
>
O
>
Oxford Road
>
405 Oxford Road - 05-117-23-41-0022
>
Correspondence
>
Re: bridge/fence/neighbors
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/22/2023 5:21:54 PM
Creation date
5/29/2018 1:18:16 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
x Address Old
House Number
405
Street Name
Oxford
Street Type
Road
Address
405 Oxford Rd
Document Type
Correspondence
PIN
0511723410022
Supplemental fields
ProcessedPID
Updated
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
52
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
�a. <br /> Dennis Shaw, 405 Oxford Road <br /> April 19, 1990 <br /> Page 2 of 3 <br /> 7. A fence that meets the above requirements would not need <br /> a permit. <br /> Given the above code requirements, I have sketched on a copy <br /> of your survey the possible location for a fence along your north <br /> property boundary that would meet code requirements. Obviously, <br /> that fence only extends to the end of the second house from the <br /> east end of Eastlake Street, and it appears that most of the <br /> activity is taking place on the west end. Since no fence would <br /> normally be allowed in that area, you might consider making a <br /> variance application to the Planning Commission and City Council, <br /> and attempt to convince those bodies that a fence along the creek <br /> would be appropriate. <br /> In reference to the bridge on your property, Chief Kilbo <br /> suggests after checking with your attorney, that you send a <br /> letter to the owner of the bridge that is encroaching on your <br /> property, giving him or her a reasonable time to move it. If it <br /> has not been moved in that time period, you could then remove it <br /> from your property. <br /> It certainly appears to be within the City's authority to <br /> require the removal of any new bridges placed across the creek, <br /> merely on the basis that we wouldn't allow any new such <br /> structures in a protected f lood plain/wetlands area. However, <br /> for the City to require removal of any pre-existing bridges of <br /> unknown age might be technically a little more difficult, such <br /> bridges coming under the definition of non-conforming structures. <br /> From a Zoning Department standpoint, un less we see dumping <br /> activity actually occurring, upon complaint we are generally <br /> required to deal with the owner of the property on which the <br /> dumping is taking place. Hence if you were to complain to us <br /> about junk being placed on your property, we probably would have <br /> to request that you clean it up, which doesn't solve the <br /> underlying problem. <br /> Regarding littering, however, Chief Rilbo indicates you <br /> should post your property "No Dumping" so that people are aware <br /> of it. Further, you must post your property with signed notices <br /> of "No Trespassing" at least on both ends and the middle of your <br /> property line. <br /> If there are names on the debris on your property or <br /> violator can be identified, a charge can be brought against the <br /> person responsible. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.