Laserfiche WebLink
. . <br /> 1. 04, <br /> o o <br /> CITY of ORONO <br /> ti <br /> RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL <br /> 4`gkESH01" NO. 2954 <br /> C) The existing house is located 10' from the lot <br /> line. <br /> D) Lakeside addition would destroy not only the <br /> design, but would allow the structure to encroach <br /> further into an average lakeshore setback area. <br /> E) Expansion to west is restricted because of existing <br /> • septic system. <br /> F) Structure will encroach no closer than the existing <br /> structure to the side lot line. <br /> Average Lakeshore Setback Variance <br /> A) The existing residence structure is located in <br /> front of the average lakeshore setback line. <br /> B) Lots are not platted to the lakeshore but have <br /> separate legal parcels that provide each with riparian <br /> access to the lake. <br /> C) Steep topography to the east will minimize any view <br /> impact upon a future residence. <br /> D) Existing year-round vegetation and topography along <br /> west minimizes impact upon existing residence to the <br /> west. <br /> 4. The City Council finds that the conditions existing on <br /> this property are peculiar to it and do not apply generally <br /> to other property in this zoning district; that granting the <br /> variance would not adversely affect traffic conditions, <br /> light, air nor pose a fire hazard or other danger to <br /> neighboring property; would not merely serve as a <br /> convenience to the applicants , but is necessary to <br /> alleviate a demonstrable hardship or difficulty; is <br /> necessary to preserve a substantial property right of the <br /> applicants; and would be in keeping with the spirit and <br /> intent of the Zoning Code and Comprehensive Plan of the <br /> City. <br /> Page 2 of 5 <br />