Laserfiche WebLink
• <br /> FILE#16-3877 <br /> November 15,2016 <br /> Page 4 of 8 <br /> Lot 4 400' None None likely Although not likely,moving <br /> house as far forward as <br /> possible toward lake would <br /> not impact neighbor's views <br /> unless house on Lot 3 is <br /> moved far westward <br /> Lot 5 200' None None likely Minimal if any impact on <br /> adjacent homes' lake views <br /> Lot 6 130' 15-20' If home on Lot 7 moves No impact on neighbor's <br /> west,ALS encroachment lake views even if home <br /> will increase moves forward <br /> Lot 7 150' 45-50' If home on Lot 6 moves Moving this house westward <br /> lakeward,that reduces the increases the ALS <br /> ALS encroachment for Lot 7 encroachment for Lot 6,but <br /> no view impacts <br /> APPLICABLE REGULATIONS <br /> 78-1279(6):Average Lakeshore Setback Regulations <br /> (6) Average lakeshore setback.No principal or accessory structure shall be located closer to <br /> the lakeshore than the average distance from the shoreline of existing residence buildings <br /> on adjacent lots; except that this does not apply to patios and other accessory structures less <br /> than 42 inches above existing grade, stairways,lifts,landings,lockboxes,flagpoles and <br /> pump houses. Further,the average lakeshore setback shall apply only to classified lakes and <br /> shall not apply to tributaries. The average lakeshore setback line shall be a straight line <br /> connecting the most lakeward protrusions of the residence buildings on the immediately <br /> adjacent lakeshore lots. <br /> a. In situations where improvement is proposed on a lot adjacent to a vacant lot or right- <br /> of-way,the average lake shore setback shall be equivalent to the setback of the most <br /> lakeward protrusion of the residence building on the immediately adjacent improved <br /> lakeshore lot. <br /> Governing Regulations:Variance(Sec. 78-123). <br /> In reviewing applications for variance, the Planning Commission shall consider the effect of the <br /> proposed variance upon the health, safety and welfare of the community, existing and anticipated <br /> traffic conditions, light and air, danger of fire, risk to the public safety, and the effect on values of <br /> property in the surrounding area. The Planning Commission shall consider recommending approval <br /> for variances from the literal provisions of the Zoning Code in instances where their strict <br /> enforcement would cause practical difficulties because of circumstances unique to the individual <br /> property under consideration,and shall recommend approval only when it is demonstrated that such <br /> actions will be in keeping with the spirit and intent of the Orono Zoning Code. Economic <br /> considerations alone do not constitute practical difficulties. Practical difficulties also include but <br /> are not limited to inadequate access to direct sunlight for solar energy systems. Variances shall be <br /> granted for earth-sheltered construction as defined in Minn. Stat. § 216C.06, subd. 2, when in <br /> harmony with this chapter. The board or the council may not permit as a variance any use that is <br /> not permitted under this chapter for property in the zone where the affected person's land is located. <br /> The board or council may permit as a variance the temporary use of a one-family dwelling as a two- <br /> family dwelling. <br />