Laserfiche WebLink
There is an opportunity to improve the process of dealing with slope failures before they occur and <br />Slope Failure and Stabilization <br />35 <br />Pre 2013 <br />in emergency situations; standards, review process, collaboration with MCWD, etc. would benefit <br />Marginal <br />2-3 <br />Ordinance or Policy <br />residents. <br />There are several areas with lots substantially below (1/2 acre or less) the minimum 2 acre lot <br />Small lots in older <br />zoning requirements; Either a new zoning district or a new district classification, i.e.: Crystal Bay, <br />36 <br />Pre 2013 <br />Yes <br />1-3 <br />Low <br />neighborhoods <br />Mtka Bluffs, Stubbs Bay Ne. Previous Councils suggested this to be reviewed as part of the <br />Comprehensive Plan. <br />37 <br />Special Events <br />2016 <br />Special Events. Review the standards for special events, specifically the number of times <br />Yes <br />1-2 <br />High <br />38 <br />Structural Coverage <br />2016 <br />Structural Coverage. Review structural coverage calculations, what is included, what isn't <br />Yes <br />1-3 <br />High <br />82-281 establishes the maximum length of a cul de sac at 1,000 feet. Recent subdivisions have exceeded this <br />39 <br />Subdivision: Cul-de-sac length <br />2015 <br />length. If the Council is comfortable with a longer maximum, the ordinance should be changed to reflect this <br />1 <br />distance. <br />40 <br />Subdivision: Outlots <br />2016 <br />Review the provision that an outlot is not a buildable lot. <br />1 <br />Subdivision: RPUD process <br />PUD, RPUD & PRD contain overlaps in the code and are confusing; A easier to understand code may <br />41 <br />Pre 2013 <br />2-3 <br />Medium <br />ordinance revisions <br />encourage more of these creative types of development. <br />42 <br />Subdivision: Special lot <br />2014 <br />Special lot combos should be clarified to exclude non -riparian lots in calculation of average Lakeshore <br />Yes <br />2-3 <br />Medium <br />combinations <br />setbacks. Drafted, need to schedule. <br />SWMP - zoning code revisions to <br />Ordinances codifying the Surface Water Management Plan standards must be adopted to fully <br />43 <br />Pre 2013 <br />2_3 <br />Medium <br />formalize implementation <br />implement the plan. <br />44 <br />Transient Merchant <br />2016 <br />Review pop up sales, food trucks, kids sales exceptions? <br />1 <br />Tree/ Landscaping. Tree <br />45 <br />2016 <br />Establish policy to review and approve/ deny tree removal in right of way <br />1 <br />Replacement requirements <br />The city should develop a clear set of objective and effective standards for permitting tree removals <br />Trees/ Landscaping Tree <br />46 <br />Pre 2013 <br />in the following situations: large and small lots, plats, conservation subdivisions, and shore land <br />Yes <br />1-2 <br />Preservation Ordinance <br />areas. <br />47 <br />Vacation Rentals <br />2015 <br />Should short term rentals be regulated by the City? <br />2-3 <br />Vehicles. Maximum number of <br />Consider limitations on the number of vehicles that can be stored outdoors on single family lots to <br />48 <br />2014 <br />1-2 <br />vehicles stored outdoors <br />avoid excessive clutter in residential properties <br />Wetlands. The City's wetland setback requirements are greater than area communities and the <br />49 <br />Wetland Setbacks <br />2015 <br />watershed district. Perhaps the benefits are no longer valid. Further, there appears to be a conflict <br />Yes <br />1-2 <br />between the septic code and the wetland setback. <br />Additional yard provisions. 78-1406 provision intended to provide relief from strict reading of the <br />50 <br />Yards. Yard setback flexibility <br />2016 <br />Yes <br />1-2 <br />Low <br />setback requirements could be more clearly written. <br />51 <br />1 Sketch Plan <br />2016 <br />Review the procedure for sketch plans. Should these include public hearings? <br />