Laserfiche WebLink
CITY OF ORONO <br /> RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL <br /> C* NO. 6 8 2 5 <br /> •KESHO <br /> WHEREAS, on November 20, 2017, by 4 to 1 vote, the Planning Commission <br /> recommended approval of the variances; and <br /> WHEREAS, on January 8, 2018, the City Council reviewed the application and the <br /> recommendations of the Planning Commission and City staff; and <br /> NOW,THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of Orono, Minnesota <br /> hereby approves the requested variances as described above based on one or more of the <br /> following findings of fact concerning the Property: <br /> FINDINGS OF FACT: <br /> 1. This application was reviewed as Zoning File #17-3979. The analysis contained within <br /> staff memos and the exhibits attached to the aforesaid memos, all minutes from the above <br /> mentioned meetings, and any and all other materials distributed at these meetings are <br /> hereby incorporated by reference. <br /> 2. The Property is located in the LR-1 B Zoning District Zoning District. <br /> 3. The Property contains 1.0 acre in area. <br /> 4. The Property is within Tier 1 and hardcover is limited to 25% according to the Stormwater <br /> Quality Overlay District. <br /> 5. Applicant has applied for the following variance[s]: <br /> a. Average Lakeshore Setback Variance <br /> b. Lake Setback Variance <br /> c. Hardcover within 75-foot Setback Variance <br /> 6. In considering this application for variances, the Council has considered the advice and <br /> recommendation of the Planning Commission and the effect of the proposed variances <br /> upon the health, safety and welfare of the community, existing and anticipated traffic <br /> conditions, light and air, danger of fire, risk to the public safety, and the effect on values <br /> of property in the surrounding area. <br /> ANALYSIS: <br /> 1. "Variances shall only be permitted when they are in harmony with the general purposes <br /> and intent of the ordinance . . . ." Construction of a screen porch addition on the residential <br /> property is consistent with the intent of the ordinance. Neighbors have indicated that the <br /> 2 <br />