My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
01-16-2018 Planning Commission Packet
Orono
>
Planning Commission
>
2018
>
01-16-2018 Planning Commission Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/23/2018 3:49:05 PM
Creation date
2/23/2018 3:47:39 PM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
376
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
FILE#17-3992 <br /> January 16,2018 <br /> Page 2 of 4 <br /> 7,463.5 s.f. 6,635s.f. 6,198s.f. <br /> Tier 1 30,622 s.f. <br /> (25%) (21.67%) (21.91%) <br /> Applicable Regulations: <br /> Average Lakeshore Setback(Section 78-1279): <br /> Average lakeshore setback. No principal or accessory structure shall be located closer to the <br /> lakeshore than the average distance from the shoreline of existing residence buildings on <br /> adjacent lots; except that this does not apply to patios and other accessory structures less <br /> than 42 inches above existing grade, stairways, lifts, landings, lockboxes, flagpoles and pump <br /> houses. Further,the average lakeshore setback shall apply only to classified lakes and shall <br /> not apply to tributaries. The average lakeshore setback line shall be a straight line connecting <br /> the most lakeward protrusions of the residence buildings on the immediately adjacent <br /> lakeshore lots. <br /> Though the new deck is smaller than the existing deck, it is not being built in the same location <br /> (higher)so non-conforming protections do not apply. <br /> Governing Regulation:Variance(Section 78-123) <br /> In reviewing applications for variance, the Planning Commission shall consider the effect of the <br /> proposed variance upon the health, safety and welfare of the community, existing and <br /> anticipated traffic conditions, light and air, danger of fire, risk to the public safety, and the effect <br /> on values of property in the surrounding area. The Planning Commission shall consider <br /> recommending approval for variances from the literal provisions of the Zoning Code in instances <br /> where their strict enforcement would cause practical difficulties because of circumstances unique <br /> to the individual property under consideration, and shall recommend approval only when it is <br /> demonstrated that such actions will be in keeping with the spirit and intent of the Orono Zoning <br /> Code. Economic considerations alone do not constitute practical difficulties. Practical difficulties <br /> also include but are not limited to inadequate access to direct sunlight for solar energy systems. <br /> Variances shall be granted for earth-sheltered construction as defined in Minn. Stat. § 216C.06, <br /> subd. 2, when in harmony with this chapter. The board or the council may not permit as a <br /> variance any use that is not permitted under this chapter for property in the zone where the <br /> affected person's land is located. <br /> According to MN §462.537 Subd. 6(2)variances shall only be permitted when: <br /> 1. The variance is in harmony with the general intent and purpose of the Ordinance. The <br /> proposed deck will be slightly taller than the previous deck but is proposed to have a <br /> smaller encroachment of 11'6" into the average lakeshore setback. The applicant has <br /> worked to mitigate the encroachment by proposing a deck that does not encroach as <br /> much compared to the previous deck.The deck will not interfere with the sightlines of <br /> the neighbors meeting the intent and purpose for the average lakeshore setback with <br /> is a sightline setback for the lake. <br /> 2. The variance is consistent with the comprehensive plan. The variances resulting in a <br /> permit for construction of a deck in a residential zone are consistent with the <br /> Comprehensive Plan. <br /> 3. The applicant establishes that there are practical difficulties. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.