Laserfiche WebLink
w <br /> FILE#17-3963 <br /> 21 Aug 2017 <br /> Page 2 of 5 <br /> location of Lot 1,the Tier 3 (35%) hardcover limitations will likely apply. <br /> Applicable Regulations: <br /> Lot Area Variance(Section 78-330) <br /> The applicant is requesting a variance from the minimum lot area standards in order to create an <br /> additional buildable lot.The LR-1B one family lakeshore residential zoning district requires one <br /> contiguous dry/upland acre for each buildable lot created.This development would create one <br /> conforming 1.0 acre lot,and one 0.67 acre lot. <br /> Comprehensive Plan Land Use Guiding <br /> The property is within the LR-1B one family lakeshore residential district which requires a minimum <br /> size of one acre and 140 feet in width per lot.There are lots in this district which are substandard in <br /> size although many meet or exceed the 1.0 acre requirement.According to the Comprehensive Plan <br /> (CMP) Map 36-B, attached as Exhibit E,the Low-Medium Density category includes virtually all single- <br /> family properties in the 1/2-acre and 1-acre zones (LR-1C and LR-1B).The "Low-Medium Density" <br /> category was incorporated into the CMP for two reasons: 1)to reflect that a majority of the Low- <br /> Medium Density area was historically subdivided into smaller lots than the zoning minimums, in a <br /> majority of cases many decades before the current zoning came into effect in 1975; and 2)to satisfy <br /> the Met Council's demand that Orono establish density categories rather than merely zoning districts <br /> (but then they only credit us with the lowest density in the range when determining whether we <br /> meet their density goals). <br /> The CMP provides guidance to the city in adopting ordinances and policies to achieve the goals and <br /> vision of the City. Based on the guidance of the CMP,the city adopted zoning regulations <br /> establishing minimum lot sizes, including for the subject parcel. The "Low-Medium Density"category <br /> was not intended to suggest that City would change the zoning to allow creation of new lots that are <br /> substandard based on their respective existing zoning. Only twice since 1975 has the City allowed <br /> the creation of new lots with substandard lot area; both in the 2-acre zones and both for what can <br /> only be considered political reasons-elimination of the Stubbs Bay Marina in 1980 which allowed <br /> creation of three small lakeshore lots as a concession to the marina owner; and creation of one 1- <br /> acre lot at the east end of Fox Street (1985-ish) in relation to expediting the Minnetonka Bluffs sewer <br /> project. In every other instance where we have developed lots smaller than the zoning,they have <br /> either been via a rezoning or via the PRD process. Via PRD we have always required that the <br /> underlying density still be met overall by the creation of open space outlots. <br /> Conservation Design (Section 78-1632) <br /> According to the Code,the Conservation Design Master Planning requirements apply to all proposed <br /> residential subdivisions or multi-unit residential developments greater than five acres in total area or <br /> guided for urban density(greater than one unit per two acres). The property meets the urban <br /> density guidance trigger,therefore a conservation design plan is required. The applicant has <br /> requested a waiver of this requirement (see Exhibit F). <br /> Governing Regulation:Variance (Section 78-123) <br /> In reviewing applications for variance, the Planning Commission shall consider the effect of the <br /> proposed variance upon the health, safety and welfare of the community, existing and anticipated <br /> traffic conditions, light and air, danger of fire, risk to the public safety, and the effect on values of <br /> property in the surrounding area. The Planning Commission shall consider recommending approval for <br /> variances from the literal provisions of the Zoning Code in instances where their strict enforcement <br /> would cause practical difficulties because of circumstances unique to the individual property under <br />