Laserfiche WebLink
FILE#17-3949 <br /> Meeting Date August 20,2017 <br /> Page 5 of 5 <br /> Public Comments <br /> To date, no public comments have been received. <br /> Issues for Consideration <br /> 1. Does the Planning Commission find that that the property owner proposes to use the <br /> property in a reasonable manner which is not permitted by an official control? <br /> 2. Does the Planning Commission find that the variance(s), if granted, will not alter the <br /> essential character of the neighborhood? <br /> 3. Does the Commission find it necessary to impose conditions in order to mitigate the <br /> impacts created by the granting of the requested variance(s)? <br /> 4. Are there any other issues or concerns with this application? <br /> Planning Staff Recommendation: <br /> Planning staff recommends approval of the variance conditioned upon the following: <br /> 1. Submittal of engineered plans with the Building permit application; <br /> 2. Approval applicable permits from the MCWD; <br /> 3. Vegetative screening plan to provide a natural looking slope when viewed from the lake; <br /> and <br /> 4. Removal of the wall directly above the rip rap,or if necessary to the stability of the slope, <br /> the applicant should provide justification and a revised plan which allows for vegetative <br /> screening of the bottom wall.Without justification, staff recommends denial of this wall. <br /> List of Exhibits <br /> Exhibit A. Application <br /> Exhibit B. Practical Difficulties Documentation Form <br /> Exhibit C. Project Narrative <br /> Exhibit D. Survey <br /> Exhibit E. Submitted Hardcover Calculations <br /> Exhibit F. Proposed Site/Landscape Plan <br /> Exhibit G. 3D Sketch Plan Drawings <br /> Exhibit H. Aerial Photos <br /> Exhibit I. Applicant and Staff Site Photos <br /> Exhibit J. Email from applicant discussing proposed base splash wall <br /> Exhibit K. Email from MCWD <br /> Exhibit L. Map and Property Owners List <br />