My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
05-15-2017 Planning Commission Packet
Orono
>
Planning Commission
>
2017
>
05-15-2017 Planning Commission Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/6/2018 2:22:29 PM
Creation date
2/6/2018 2:21:34 PM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
248
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
MINUTES OF THE <br /> ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING <br /> Monday,April 17,2017 <br /> 6:30 o'clock p.m. <br /> Barnhart stated in 2016,the City processed 41 variances and setback variances related to street or side <br /> setbacks were included in 19 of them. Barnhart stated surveys for those properties were looked at to <br /> apply the new zoning ordinances. One of the properties had a 1-foot setback but most of the setbacks <br /> were in the 11 to 25 feet range. Barnhart stated if the new setbacks are applied based on the draft <br /> ordinance,the number of nonconformities is reduced from five to two, so there is some benefit to the new <br /> setbacks. <br /> Landgraver stated in the past 10 feet has been a fairly firm number. Landgraver asked if the changes <br /> would be giving everybody two feet on each side. <br /> Barnhart stated the minimum setback would be eight feet on each side. Barnhart stated ten feet is <br /> appropriate and does not really create a hardship for most property owners. <br /> Thiesse stated in his view 10 feet is reasonable. <br /> Amy Nelson asked if this would set a precedent so other people in the same zoning district somewhere <br /> else in the City would wonder why they do not fall within under the same jurisdiction. <br /> Gaffron stated any 50-foot lots would get the same setback. Gaffron stated if the City is routinely giving <br /> people variances to a particular setback,it might as well be put into the code. <br /> Barnhart stated what he has heard is that the Planning Commission does not want to go less than ten. The <br /> draft ordinance is proposing in four different zoning districts some flexibility from the setback <br /> requirements if the lot is nonconforming in width. <br /> Landgraver stated in his view the discussion by the Planning Commission would be more vigorous if this <br /> had been discussed earlier in the evening. <br /> Lemke moved,Leskinen seconded to table Application No. 17-3925,City of Orono,Text <br /> Amendment: Small Lots/Setbacks. VOTE: Ayes 6,Nays 0. <br /> 13. UPDATE ON CITY COUNCIL MEETINGS HELD ON MARCH 22,2017,AND <br /> Page 70 of 72 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.