My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
05-15-2017 Planning Commission Packet
Orono
>
Planning Commission
>
2017
>
05-15-2017 Planning Commission Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/6/2018 2:22:29 PM
Creation date
2/6/2018 2:21:34 PM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
248
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
MINUTES OF THE <br /> ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING <br /> Monday,April 17,2017 <br /> 6:30 o'clock p.m. <br /> Nelson noted she spoke with the Council about it this year as well as Staff in years past and that in her <br /> view the City is missing the opportunity to address this with the Comprehensive Plan Update. Nelson <br /> stated it was suggested to her to wait until the Comprehensive Plan Update but nobody seems to want to <br /> address rezoning anything in the Comprehensive Plan because people think it will change the character of <br /> the neighborhood. Nelson commented the proposed ordinance will do the same thing. <br /> Nelson stated in her view massing will be an issue and is a far greater threat to the character of the <br /> neighborhood. Nelson stated she is asking that consideration be given to rezoning her neighborhood. <br /> Nelson noted no other house in her neighborhood could subdivide if it is rezoned to one acre. Nelson <br /> commented it is likely all of these small neighborhoods have a lot or two that contain a property similar to <br /> hers and they would feel like they were not given their full due by creating a situation like this. <br /> Nelson requested the Planning Commission reject Option 3 and to create a solution that will be more <br /> equitable to everybody. <br /> Barnhart noted Option 3 would be changing the setbacks applicable to specific zoning districts and that <br /> the ordinance tries to provide some flexibility based on nonconforming lots. <br /> Landgraver asked if Option 2 would allow a larger lot to be subdivided. <br /> Barnhart stated if the size requirement was changed,the property could be subdivided assuming they have <br /> the appropriate frontage. <br /> Landgraver commented there are probably only a handful of large lots located in a small lot <br /> neighborhood. <br /> Gaffron stated the boundaries of the neighborhood should probably be defined before making this type of <br /> decision. <br /> Chair Thiesse closed the public hearing at 12:10 p.m. <br /> Page 69 of 72 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.