My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
05-15-2017 Planning Commission Packet
Orono
>
Planning Commission
>
2017
>
05-15-2017 Planning Commission Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/6/2018 2:22:29 PM
Creation date
2/6/2018 2:21:34 PM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
248
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
MINUTES OF THE <br /> ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING <br /> Monday,April 17,2017 <br /> 6:30 o'clock p.m. <br /> Lemke suggested the hours be restricted from 8 a.m.to noon on Saturday. <br /> Fretham stated that would probably be easier. <br /> Thiesse noted there would be nothing on Sunday and 8 a.m. to noon on Saturday for retrieving of <br /> materials only. Thiesse asked how the Planning Commission feels about Item No.4. <br /> Leskinen asked if the public health concerns raised by the Dumases relating to the toxins is something <br /> covered by the MPCA. <br /> Fretham stated he is sure there is some guideline for it and some agency that would be in charge of it but <br /> that he has not come across it in his prior projects. Fretham stated it is probably part of one of the permits <br /> they have to apply for. <br /> Lemke stated he would assume the MPCA would have control over that. <br /> Leskinen asked what items are in place to keep the dust under control. <br /> Fretham commented technology has come a long way and that the equipment has spray bars that spray <br /> water onto the debris to control the dust. <br /> Thiesse noted No. 5 deals with construction of the berm. <br /> Fretham stated the berm will be constructed but that he will need to come back for a separate conditional <br /> use permit for it. <br /> Thiesse stated Item No. 6 is the condition that an annual review of the interim use permit shall be <br /> conducted. <br /> Leskinen stated she would not mind seeing something more frequent, such as a 6-month review. <br /> Page 29 of 72 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.