Laserfiche WebLink
16-3883 <br /> April 17,2017 <br /> Page 4 of 7 <br /> For Lot 2, topography and the location (and maintenance needs) of the existing municipal sewer <br /> lines are complicating factors. The municipal sewer installed in 1973 crosses the property from <br /> north to south. See Exhibits C &D. The sewer lines consist of a gravity line flowing from south <br /> to north across the site, discharging to a lift station at the very north end of the property at the <br /> shore, which in turn pumps into a parallel forcemain that runs back up the hill adjacent to the <br /> gravity line, discharging to a manhole in Windjammer Lane. <br /> The easement for that sewer line pair is 20' wide,and no structures can be built over that easement. <br /> The impact is that the proposed house location for Lot 2 is restricted to the area between the sewer <br /> easement and the 75' setback,with little flexibility for shifting the house. To make matters worse, <br /> the actual vehicle route used by the Public Works Department follows the dashed line on Exhibit <br /> C for maintenance of the lift station, due to the topography. It is necessary on a regular basis to <br /> bring a truck down to the lift station for maintenance, and there is no other way to access the lift <br /> station. The City needs to preserve this non-easement route for future sewer system maintenance. <br /> The 40'x80' "possible house" site depicted on Lot 2 is virtually the only area of Lot 2 that is a <br /> desirable house location under the proposed subdivision layout; but also consider that it is likely a <br /> house at this will be expected to have decks, patios, and a walkout configuration. City code will <br /> disallow any grading or filling within the 75' zone, and there is barely 5 feet of elevation change <br /> from the 75' line to the sewer easement. All of these factors dictate the need for careful and <br /> creative house design for Lot 2. <br /> Lot 3 contains the existing house,built in 1956 according to tax records. Replacing the house will <br /> likely require it to move back from the lake some distance, as the 75' setback line appears to run <br /> through the east side of the structure. With or without the proposed subdivision, an average <br /> lakeshore setback variance would be required for replacement of this house, again suggesting that <br /> this should be addressed as part of the plat approval process. <br /> Road Layout and Standards <br /> An initial question for discussion was whether the road serving the proposed 3-lot development <br /> should be public or private. During the sketch plan review it was indicated by the developer that <br /> a private road would be most appropriate, and that is what is proposed. <br /> Although only a small number of homes will be served, the City code requires for 3-6 lots a road <br /> of 24' paved width in a 50' road corridor, ending in a 100' diameter cul-de-sac with 80' paved <br /> width. <br /> The road access onto North Arm Drive is at the outside of a curve, and would not be expected to <br /> have any sight-distance concerns. At slightly less than 300 feet in length the cul-de-sac meets the <br /> City's 1000-foot maximum length limitation. <br /> It is unknown at this time whether curb and gutter would be required in order to manage stormwater <br /> runoff. Preliminary street design and grading information will be reviewed by the City Engineer <br /> prior to the preliminary plat review by the City Council. <br /> The proposed cul-de-sac location abuts the rear yard of the existing residence at 835 Windjammer <br /> Lane. While those owners and their predecessors have experienced a single private driveway at <br /> that location since the house at 835 was built in 1969, the driveway at 800 North Arm has existed <br /> at its current location since at least the 1940s or earlier based on available historic airphotos. <br /> Conversion of the driveway to a road may have negative impacts to those neighbors,who have not <br /> commented on the project as of this writing.Moving the private road further north to provide some <br /> buffer might be feasible but would result in less usable street yard area for Lot 1. <br />