My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
info on exterior insulation/filling material, etc.-1999
Orono
>
Property Files
>
Street Address
>
N
>
North Shore Drive
>
4753 North Shore Drive - 07-117-23-32-0020
>
Misc
>
info on exterior insulation/filling material, etc.-1999
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/22/2023 5:35:07 PM
Creation date
1/31/2018 3:38:49 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
x Address Old
House Number
4753
Street Name
North Shore
Street Type
Drive
Address
4753 North Shore Dr
Document Type
Misc
PIN
0711723320020
Supplemental fields
ProcessedPID
Updated
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
42
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
PROJECT NO: 4140 92-2757 DATE: July 23, 1993 <br /> PAGE: 6 <br /> TEST METHODS (cont.): <br /> Sale Removal <br /> One 2' by 8' piece of each ASTM C578 type was removed from the foundation each fall. The average soil <br /> moisture content at the time of removal varied from 6.8 - 12.4 % by weight (this corresponds to 0.91 - <br /> 1.67 gallons of water per cubic foot of soil). Test specimens were removed from each sample, tested, <br /> conditioned at 73.4 ±3.6°F and 50 ±5 % RH to moisture equilibrium, and tested again. The conditioning <br /> atmosphere was considered to be"standard laboratory atmosphere" and moisture equilibrium was considered <br /> to be the point where the weight of the sample did not change by more than 0.1% over a 24 hour period. <br /> Moisture Content - <br /> The moisture content was determined by drying the thermal resistance test specimens and recording the <br /> weight loss. The specimens were dried for 24 hours at 122'F in a circulating air oven (uncontrolled <br /> humidity). The dried specimens are considered to be without moisture and therefore the difference in <br /> weights is attributable to the amount of moisture that was present in the samples. The moisture content was <br /> determined at the time of removal from the foundation and after reconditioning at 73.4 ± 3.6°F and 50 <br /> ± 5 % RH to moisture.equilibrium. The moisture content was calculated as the volume of water present <br /> in a given volume of sample, on a percentage basis. <br /> Density Test - <br /> The density test was conducted in accordance with ASTM:D1622-88, "Standard Test Method for Apparent <br /> Density of Rigid Cellular Plastics." Three, 12" by 12" specimens were conditioned at 73.4 ± 3.6°F and <br /> 50 ± 5 % RH to moisture equilibrium. The length, width, and thickness of each specimen was determined <br /> as the average of three measurements. Each specimen was weighed on a model 1364MP Sartorius digital <br /> balance, SIN 3202200. The density was calculated for each specimen as the weight divided by fhe volume. <br /> Thermal Resistance - <br /> The thermal resistance test was conducted according to ASTM: C518-91, "Standard Test Method for <br /> Steady-State Heat Flux Measurements and Thermal Transmission Properties by Means of the Heat Flow <br /> Meter Apparatus." Three 12" x 12" specimens were removed from each sample, tested, conditioned to <br /> steady-state at 73.4 ± 3.6°F and 50 ± 5 % RH to moisture equilibrium, and tested again. Each specimen <br /> was placed in a thermal conductivity instrument, model Rapid-K, manufactured by Holometrix, Inc. <br /> Steady-state heat flux measurements were made at a mean temperature of 75°F using a hot face tempera4ure <br /> of 100°F and a cold face temperature of 50°F. Thermal conductivity and thermal resistance 'Were <br /> determined by comparing the heat flux measurements of each specimen to measurements made on a <br /> standard reference material of known thermal resistance and thermal conductivity. <br /> DATA: <br /> See Appendix A of this report for the test data for each year. <br /> AS A MUTUAL PROTECTION TO CLIENTS.THE PUBLIC AND OURSELVES.ALL TWIN CITY TESTING CORPORATION REPORTS ARE SUBMITTED AS THE CONFIDENTIAL PROPERTY OF CL EN'S <br /> AND AUTHORIZATION FOR PUBLICATION OF STATEMENTS.CONCLUSIONS OR EXTRACTIONS FROM OR REGARDING OUR REPORTS IS RESERVED PENDING OUR PRIOR WRITTEN APPQCVAL <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.