Laserfiche WebLink
Also, I do have the surveyor removing the "existing elevations" from the survey for the as-built. <br /> Rick Hendel <br /> HENDEL <br /> Building Highly Detailed Residences&Renovations <br /> 15250 Wayzata Boulevard#108 <br /> Wayzata,MN 55391 <br /> 952.404.7204 OFFICE <br /> From: Laura Oakden [mailto:loakden@ci.orono.mn.us] <br /> Sent:Tuesday, February 20, 2018 10:50 AM <br /> To: Rick Hendel <rick@hendelhomes.com> <br /> Cc:Jeremy Barnhart<jbarnhart@ci.orono.mn.us>; Roger Peitso<rpeitso@ci.orono.mn.us> <br /> Subject: RE: Permit 2017-01424 and Variance 17-3967 <br /> Hello Rick, <br /> Thank you for the email. It was during the as built foundation review that we realized the building permit plans did not <br /> match the variance approvals. The home in the building plans were almost 2 feet taller than what was approved by <br /> variance by the City Council.This new roof expansion created an encroachment in the setback areas where variance are <br /> needed. <br /> City staff can only approve permit for projects that meet the city code or where variances are granted.The building <br /> plans you submitted for permit do not meet the city code or the variance approvals because of the roof line <br /> expansion. If you want to move forward with the roof shown on the building plans you would need City Council <br /> approval for another variance, or you could continue construction by submitting new plans that match the already <br /> approved variance. <br /> Because city staff does not have the authority to approve permits that do not meet city code your current permit is not <br /> valid and construction cannot continue until the discrepancy is resolved. <br /> The city has placed a stop work order on this project until new plans are submitted and approved that match the city <br /> code and the approved variances. <br /> Additionally,the foundation as built identified old/preexisting foundation elevations as "existing elevations" all <br /> previous notations on the survey should be removed. Only current as built elevations should be shown. The garage top <br /> of foundation elevations called out 940.9 and 942.9, suggesting either a 2 foot step down into the garage or a 2 foot <br /> height increase of the garage floor. Please clarify the current elevations on site.Also, please include the lake side <br /> foundation as built elevation. <br /> I just revived your new plans. I will review them with Roger to confirm this has solved the roof line issue. If these are <br /> matching and we can allow you to proceed so you still want a meeting with city staff? It appears we wouldn't be able to <br /> have a meeting until tomorrow afternoon with all the parties. <br /> Thank you, <br /> Laura Oakden <br /> Planner <br /> City of Orono <br /> Direct 952.249.4602 <br /> 2750 Kelley Parkway, Orono, MN 55356 <br /> 3 <br />