My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Resolution 5722
Orono
>
Property Files
>
Street Address
>
N
>
North Shore Drive
>
3669 North Shore Drive - 08-117-23-34-0051
>
Resolutions
>
Resolution 5722
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/22/2023 5:46:26 PM
Creation date
12/4/2017 1:03:04 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
x Address Old
House Number
3669
Street Name
North Shore
Street Type
Drive
Address
3669 North Shore Dr
Document Type
Resolutions
PIN
0811723340051
Supplemental fields
ProcessedPID
Updated
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
16
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
�O� <br /> O 4 <br /> CITY of ORONO <br /> a � <br /> ti <br /> ��� �G~' R ESOLUTION OF TH T OUNCI L <br /> `�kE8H.04' NO. �� � � <br /> NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of Orono, <br /> Minnesota: <br /> FINDINGS <br /> 1. This application was reviewed as Zoning File 07-3329. <br /> 2. The property is located in the LR-1C One Family Residential Zoning District <br /> which requires a minimum lot area of 0.5 acre and a minimum lot width of 100'. <br /> 3. The Planning Commission reviewed this application at public hearings held on <br /> November 19, 2007 and January 22, 2008 and recommended approval of <br /> variances based on the following findings: <br /> a. The property contains 5,925 s.f. (0.13 acre) in area and has 47' in width. <br /> b. The lot is substandard in area and a residence has existed on the property for <br /> many years. <br /> c. There is no additional land available to bring the ]ot width or lot area into <br /> conformity. <br /> d. The Applicant submitted a revised proposal following the direction given by <br /> the Planning Commission at the November 19, 2007 public hearing meeting. <br /> e. The hardcover variance request as revised reflects reductions in both the 0-75' <br /> and 7�'-?�U' zones. <br /> f. The 66 s.f. shed should be removed. <br /> g. The revised, proposed second-story complies with average ]alceshore, both <br /> side yard, and rear (street) yard setback requirements. The second-story is <br /> proposed to be setback 64' from the lake where a 75' setback is required. <br /> 4. The City Council has considered this application including the findings and <br /> recommendation of the Planning Commission, reports by City staff, comments by <br /> the Applicant and the public, and the effect of the proposed variance on the <br /> health, safety and welfare of the community. <br /> Pa�e 2 of 5 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.