Laserfiche WebLink
Lake Minnetonka Conservation District <br /> Regular Board Meeting <br /> October 9,2002 Page 3 <br /> , Foster stated that he believed the intent of the 20'side setback for canopies was to aliow better views for <br /> abutting property owners that might be obstructed from a less restrictive side setback requirement. Because <br /> the Finney property abuts North Sho�e Marina that is a commercial property, he stated that he would not be <br /> troubled with a smaller side setback for the property to shield them from the commercial activity. <br /> Babcock stated that a dock with a canopy is not prohibited at this site. The problem at this site is that the <br /> applicant is proposing to put both a canopy and a wide dock within the authorized dock area. There was no <br /> adjustment of the side site line extensions at the Finney site and he expressed concem about granting a <br /> variance that would allow them to store more watercraft than they would be allowed if a dock length variance <br /> was not granted. <br /> Nybeck continued his comments: <br /> • At the Hendrickson/Windenburg site, the Findings include variance from Code for dock length,side <br /> setbacks,and an adjusted dock use area. A dock use area length variance would be granted to a <br /> length of 100'from the 929.4'shoreline. The northerly extension of the eastem extended side site <br /> line would be deflected 13 degrees 31 minutes to the west from the point at which it crosses the <br /> 929.4'shoreline. The side lines of the dock use area would be the area lying between the following <br /> two lines: a line five feet west of a parallel to the adjusted east lot line and a line 39'west of an <br /> parallel to the�justed east lot line. The dock use area shall not include the area lying west of the <br /> extended west lot line of this site. No side opening slips would be permitted opening either toward <br /> the west or toward the east. <br /> • At the Pacovsky site, the Findings include a variance from Code for length and an adjusted dock use <br /> area. The dock use area length variance would be granted to a length of 90'from the 929.4' <br /> shoreline. The northerly extension of the westem extended side site line would be adjusted as <br /> described in the Hendrickson/Windenburg site. The northerly extension of the eastem extended side <br /> site line would be deflected 15 degrees 13 minutes to the east ftom the point at which it crosses the <br /> 929.4'shoreline. The dock use area shall maintain a five foot setback from both of the deflected east <br /> and west lot line extensions. Only one straight dock may be constructed in the dock use area and <br /> such dock shall be constructed adjacent to the west edge of the dock use area. Only one watercraft <br /> could be stored at this dock and it may not have a beam exceeding 8%2 feet and must be stored on <br /> the east side of the dock. Some Board members have expressed interest in also restricting the <br /> length of the watercraft. <br /> Babcock stated that he would support restricting the length of the watercraft at the Pacovsky site to 24' <br /> length overall, with its equipment in normal operating position. <br /> Nybeck stated that the Board might want to expand the order to include the Wallace property at 3160 North <br /> Shore Drive. In the draft Findings for the Blomberg site, a dock use area length variance would be granted to <br /> a length of 100'from the 929.4' shoreline. Blomberg has requested a dock length variance at his property <br /> and the adjacent property to the east,of 130'from the 929.4'shoreline. Blomberg proposed a five foot side <br /> setback for the entire 130' long dock use area on the west side and a 10'side setback on the east side. In <br /> the draft Findings, LeFevere has proposed setbacks from extended line of five feet for the first 50'from the <br /> 929.4'shoreline and 10'setbacks for the area between 50'and 100'from the 929.4'shoreline. The granting <br /> of a length variance to 130'at both sites would generally allow the common dock they share to be continued. <br /> Babcock stated that extending the dock use area to 130'from the 929.4'shoreline at the Blomberg site might <br /> make sense because of the water depth problems in the area,especially if its four feet at the end of the dock. <br />