Re: tree removal - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

hmvu�rEs oF� � oRONo crrY cotnvcII,MEETnvc 11�onday,Much 14,2016 7:8t1 o'clock p.m. 9. #16-3803 STONEWOOD,LLC,ON BEAAI,F OF TASHITAA TUFAA,1830 SHORELINE DRIVE�,VARIANCES A�iD CONDITIONAL USE PERMTT(continu�d) McMillan�ated now that the hause is being moved ten feet furthe,r fiom the lalc�, it does not appear the drir+eway wi�l impact the n+eighbor as much but that she waats to make�uurc the apron does not cause a lot of runoff. K,�i�tt indicatsd thene should not be a Iot of runoff from the driveway and that the nu►off is more dir�cted towards the lake. K1int indicated they are willing to work with the neighbor on the screening and that they are allowed a 6-foot fence in that area,which would help bloek headli�hts shining onto the neighbor's property. Gvstafson stated as it relates to the width of the driveway.the nsrrowest width they typically go to is 12 feet,w}iiah only gives a three-foot flare on each side. Gustafson stated fhey do not wam to make the corner tot�tight,which would result in p�xrplc driving on the la.wn. McMillaz►stated she understands the desine far off�trcet p�arking but t�at her concera was with the width of ttie clriveway. McMillan stated the site does allow fcir quite a bit of m,ov�ment af cars but th�t she dces not want it to be exceesive. K1int atated in their view this was the better scenario since it did not give the ap�pearance of having a parking lot or garage in front. The proposed d�esig,n gives more of the illustcation of a ssnall street rnnning thmugh the pmp�ty rathet than a large patc�of asph�lt in front of the�arage. Carnick stated th�e w$ikway leading to the house fram the st�et scems to be redundant. Klint stated th�e property o�uvner was rather adamant about that and that it is a more pedestrian oriented entrance to tbe lat rather than just the drivewsy. Custafson stated it��vely ia�landscapi�g eleme�t and is msant to be welcaming. Levang eslced arhat it wi11 be consttuctsd of. Kli�indicated it most likcly would be a gaver of some sort. Levang stat�d she understan�ds the point of it being more welcoming for the neighbors. Walsh stated he appreciates Mr.Winston's comments about the Planning Commission and how there has not bcen any concems raised about the sethack variance. Walsh stated he would like to set the t+ecord straight and that he did h�v+e issue with a couple of the variances a�d that the Council did not have agnement on the two curb cuts and the side sefback issue. Walsh stated buying a corner lat is not a practir,al difficulty in most people's eyes since the person know�what they are buying. VVhile the Council did nat give a specific number on the setbaek,Walsh stated he was haping ta see a complete redesign with anty one curb cut rather than simply a 3-foot reduction in the eneroachment. Walsh not�d Mr.Winston also said that this site compels the need for variances but in 1us vie�v it does not. Walsh stat�d if someone wants to put something on a lot that daes ndt fit,then it becomes an issue. Waish stated he is not adverse to a big house but that the applieant should try to fit the house on the lot without variances. Page 9 of 37