Re: tree removal - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

MINUTE3 OF 1'HE � ORONO CITY COUNCII.MEETIIWG Mondsy,l�iuch 14,201b 7:�D o'+elock p.m. 9. #1b-38�3 5T01�'EWOOD,LLC,ON BEHAIfF OF TASffiTAA TUFAA,1830 SHORELINE DRIVE,VARIANCES AND CONDITIONAL USE PERNIIT(con�erred) City Attorney M�ttick statod he understands where Mr.VVinstom is coming from in terms of estabfishing a praetical difficulty,but t�at in aa agplication like this,there are a number of factors that nced to be taken into cQnsideration. Mattick stated if ther8 are tfiings in the Cnuncil's opinion that should be looked at, thos�are apFuvpriate to consider. Mattick state,d there was a lot af discussion about the driveway hardcvver but that he does not believe a hardcover variance is at p}ay in this appiication. Mattick etated where the driveway is located and how much hard�cover exists m�y oome info play when discussing other variances. Mattick asked if a variance is required for the driveway or the second curb cut. C3a�Eron statad the driveway eituation is not a zoning issue but a Chapter 18 stc+eets issue$nd is not subject to the pr�ic.�1 difficulty�alysis specifically. Printu�asked if a condition eauld be that a curb cut be removed as part of t�e side stceet setback variance. Mattick state�d as long�they still have accesa,the Council could deny the second curb cut. Mattick s#ated whether there are two accesses or not is up to the City Cauncil. Mattick noted the County does ccmtrol the right�f-way and that the Couaty waats poople to use the local roads for sccesa whenever possible. Mattick stated he does un�derstand the desire to take it off af the local road to preserve some of the parls�g but that he would enviaion the County denyiug that. Walsh stated he would agrec with thet and that thene sbould be as few curb cuts on any main artery road as possi�le. MeMillan etatod it is part of the Council's job to make sure the roads are safer. Printup raquested the motion be amended to require the second curb cub onto Heritage Lane be elimina�ed if a varisnce is granted for the side street setback and that the access be onto He.ritage Drive. I.evang in�icatsd she would not accept that amendment. MeMitlan stated they could make a mation to that effect. Walsh stated he would second Council Member Printup's motion so it ean be voted on. Priuntup moved,Walsh sccond�xi,Application No. 16-38Q3,Stonewood,LLe,on behalf of TaslutAa Tufaa,1830 Shoreline Drive,to smend the motion to deny the second cnrb cnt onto Heritxge Lane as a condition of the side�treet setback variance. McMillan stat�the3r would be voting on whether to amend the motion to deny the curb cut on Heritage Lane. Page 18 of 37