My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Re: tree removal
Orono
>
Property Files
>
Street Address
>
H
>
Heritage Lane
>
1185 Heritage Lane - 10-117-23-42-0002 - New Address
>
Correspondence
>
Re: tree removal
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/22/2023 3:27:19 PM
Creation date
6/20/2017 12:53:14 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
x Address Old
House Number
1185
Street Name
Heritage
Street Type
Lane
Address
1185 Heritage Lane
Document Type
Correspondence
PIN
1011723420002
Supplemental fields
ProcessedPID
Updated
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
37
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Nmvu�rEs oF� <br /> ' ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING <br /> Monday,February 8,2016 <br /> 7:00 o'clack p.m. <br /> lY. #Ib-3803 STONEWOOD,I.LC,ON BEHALF OF TASHITA,A TUFqq,1830 <br /> SHOREIINE ROAD,VARIANCES AND CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT (co�tixu�d) <br /> McMillan askod if the Council is in agreement that th�ere only be one curb cut. <br /> It was the consensus af the City Council that thtre�e only one curb cut. <br /> McMillan statcd the Council shoulci perhaps discuss where the curb cut should be located. McMillan <br /> asked if the Council feels the driveyasy should be smsller. <br /> Mattick noted that the applica�meet the hardcovcr requinements and that perhaps the Council cfluld <br /> look at that after they revise their p1Rns, <br /> Walsh commented thc driveway would likely be amaller simply as a result of oae of the curb cuts being <br /> elimin�ted. <br /> McMiilsn asked how the Council feels about the fence. <br /> Printup,Walah and McMillaa agreed th�re dces not appear to be a practical diffculty for tlu higher <br /> fence. <br /> Lev�ng aslced if th�ere is one aection that they would be allowed to have a 6-foot fence. <br /> L���i�t�th�t is correct. C�rtis stated a 6-foot fence would be allowed fro�the setback at the 50- <br /> foot setback up to the average sedback li�. <br /> McMillan sta#ed it appears the majority of the City C.ouncil is in a�reement tbat thc fence should be <br /> ',Y(� lim�ited to 42 inches in height. <br /> �('\1 <br /> � McMillan asked if the City Council is okay with the conditional use permit. <br /> � Levang and Walsh indicat.ed they are fine with the conditsaa�al use permit. <br /> � McMillan asked if there will be any landscaping. <br /> Curtis stated if the Council would like to see the landscaping,they should spxify that in the direction to <br /> tl�applicant. <br /> It was the consensus of the City Council that the applicants submit plans reflecting the landscaping they <br /> are praposing. <br /> McMillan stated thc Council should next discuss the sidc setback variance. <br /> Walsh stat�in his view the house should be radesigned and the side setback variance r�educed. Waish <br /> stated he does not believe a 20-foot variance is neecled. <br /> Page 33 of 32 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.