Laserfiche WebLink
! i <br /> / O <br /> � � <br /> O O <br /> , C ITY of ORONO <br /> ,� � <br /> ti <br /> RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL <br /> �\�9 E p4�'G~ NO. � �i � <br /> �S� <br /> case would be the north property line. Staff would recommend . <br /> approval of a variance to the 35' setback to thz alley, and require a <br /> 10' setback be maintained based on the followina hardship: the alley <br /> has historically provided access to the propertt-; the City does not <br /> intend to develop or maintain the alley; the alley R•ould continue to be <br /> used privately by the owners of the propen� for dri�•eway purposes; the <br /> north property line would function as side, inc�rior lot line; a 10' <br /> standard setback would be appropriate in chis case, and would be in <br /> keeping with the intent of the zoning ordinance and Comprehensive <br /> Plan; and requiring a 35' setback would not allo�- a suitable building <br /> site on what has historically been a residentiall�• developed property, <br /> and would move construction of the house closer to the lakeshore <br /> which is not in the best interests of water qualit�- and protecting lake <br /> views for adjacent properties. <br /> 4. The City Council finds that the conditions e.r-isting on this property are <br /> peculiar to it and do not apply generally to other property in this zoning <br /> district; that granting the variances would not ad�-ersely affect traffic <br /> conditions, li�ht, air nor pose a fire hazard or other danJer to neighboring <br /> property; would not merely serve as a convenience to the applicants, but is <br /> necessary to alleviate a demonstrable hardship or difficulty; is necessary to <br /> preserve a substantial property right of the applicant�; and would be in <br /> keeping �vith the spirit and intent of the Zoning Code and Comprehensive Plan <br /> of the City. <br /> 5. The City Council has considered this application includin� the findings and <br /> recommendations of the Plannin� Commission, reports b}� City staff, comments <br /> by the applicants and the effect of the proposed ��ariance on the health, safety <br /> and welfare of the communit}�. <br /> � Page 3 of 8 <br />