My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
09-24-1984 Council Minutes
Orono
>
City Council
>
Minutes
>
Historical
>
1980-1989
>
1984
>
09-24-1984 Council Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/24/2015 1:43:35 PM
Creation date
4/24/2015 1:43:34 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
9
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO COUNCIL MEETING HELD SEPTEMBER 24, 1984 PAGE 4 <br /> CRYSTAL BAY AREA SANITARY <br /> SEWER IMPROVEMENT PROJECT3. 50 percent of the total cost assessed against the <br /> benefitting property owners would result in a <br /> total assessment of $6 ,705 . <br /> One man asked why the Art Center was excluded from the <br /> sewer project. <br /> Mayor Butler stated that the Art Center was excluded <br /> from the sewer project because they have enough space <br /> to expand theirsepticsystemif needed. Butler noted <br /> that the Art Center is outside the MUSA boundary and to <br /> redraw that line the City would have to have approval <br /> from the Metropolitan Council. <br /> Assistant Zoning Administrator Gaffron stated that <br /> staff would have to research the exact location of that <br /> MUSA line. <br /> LaDean McWilliam asked that the Council continue to <br /> seek funding for the project. <br /> City Engineer Cook noted the time frame of the sewer <br /> �construction. Cook stated that approximately 1 <br /> mont� of preparation, a 60 day actual digging period of <br /> heavy construction, and 1 month to clean up. <br /> Gary Printup stated that the public ' s main concern is <br /> the cost of the project. Printup stated that they <br /> would like to see the Council choose option 3 . <br /> Printup stated that it would not be precedent setting <br /> to assess the cost of sewer like option 3 because <br /> there are only two areas that need sewer in Orono and <br /> that is Crystal Bay and Stubbs Bay. <br /> Councilmember Frahm stated that if the City chooses <br /> option 3 and the City has to pay for 50 percent of the <br /> sewer project, that 50 percent would roll over onto the <br /> general public. Frahm statec' that the general public <br /> in turn would ask why their taxes are going up because <br /> of the Crystal Bay sewer project when other projects in <br /> the City had to pay for 100 percent of a project. <br /> Frah� stated that assessing the cost of a project with <br /> option 3 would be precedence setting. Frahm stated <br /> that he would have to see the appraisals of the <br /> properties before he could decide which option to take <br /> as far as the assessments. <br /> Councilmember Grabek stated that the Council has to <br /> have some rationale to explain to the general tax <br /> payers when they ask why their taxes went up because of <br /> sewer that is benefitting the Crystal Bay area when <br /> they don't even live in the area. Grabek stated that <br /> he cannot decide which option to choose until he gets <br /> more information from staff in regard to how much the <br /> general tax payers taxes will go up if the Council <br /> chooses an 80 : 20 ratio or 70 : 30 ratio or 50 : 50 . <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.