Laserfiche WebLink
MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO COUNCIL MEETING HELD SEPTEMBER 24, 1984 PAGE 3 <br /> CRYSTAL BAY AREA SANITARY <br /> SEWER IMPROVEMENT PROJECT <br /> A,rlin Jansen stated that she did not receive a public <br /> hearing notice. <br /> Assistant Zoning Administrator Gaffron noted that Ms. <br /> Jansen is outside the proposed Crystal Bay project <br /> area and was not included on the list. <br /> Rich Kiemen of 1212 Briar Street stated that he did not <br /> receive a notice either. <br /> Mayor Butler noted that Mr. Kiemen is on the mailing <br /> list for the public hearing notice. Butler noted that <br /> Lukanen and Kiemen should have received a notice <br /> because they were mailed by the City. Butler also <br /> noted that the public hearing was published in the <br /> paper. Mayor Butler accepted the petition from the <br /> neighbors. <br /> City Attorney Radio stated that the public hearing <br /> could still be held. <br /> City Engineer Cook reviewed with the audience where <br /> the sewer lines would run on the streets . Cook stated <br /> that the septic tanks are failing on many of the <br /> properties in the Crystal Bay area and that the area is <br /> in need of sewer. Cook stated that the estimate f or <br /> the installation of sewer is based on 1985 dollars . <br /> Cook stated that for the installation of sanitary <br /> sewer it would cost $645 , 400 and for the street <br /> restoration another $467 , 500 . Cook stated that the <br /> total for the whole project is $1 , 112 , 900 . Cook <br /> stated there would be an annual cost of $4 , 500 to <br /> maintain the lift station. Cook stated that there are <br /> 83 units that would be assessed for sewer and the cost <br /> per unit would be $13 ,410 . Cook stated that an <br /> additional $1,500 per unit for the connection to the <br /> line was anticipated. <br /> Councilmember Adams arrived at 8 :55 p.m. <br /> City Engineer Cook stated that the Council has the <br /> option of how the sewer project can be assessed. Cook <br /> stated that a breakdown of the assessments on an annual <br /> basis has been provided. Cook stated that probably a <br /> 15 year assessment at 11 percent interest would be <br /> used. Cook stated that staff looked at three <br /> different options for the assessment as follows : <br /> l. The entire assessment based on 100 percent <br /> assessed against the benefitting property owners <br /> would result in a $13 ,410 per unit with a first <br /> year charge of $2 ,692. 41 on down to the year 2000 <br /> where assessment would be $992. 34 . <br /> 2. 75 percent of the total cost assessed against the <br /> _ benefitting property owners would result in a <br /> total assessment of $10 , 060 per vnit and a $2 , 000 <br /> assessment for the first year and on down to <br /> 745_ 11 _ <br />