Laserfiche WebLink
MINUTES OF THE REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING HELD JULY 9, 1984. PAGE 5 <br /> #834 BRIAN FULMER Zoning Administrator Mabusth stated that staff felt <br /> that the residential unit should be under separate <br /> conditional use permit and treated like a guest house <br /> use. Mabusth stated that staff will require <br /> additional parking spaces and will use commercial <br /> zoning district standards to refer to. <br /> Councilmember Adams stated that the number 175 was too <br /> much and 150 would be better. <br /> Councilmember Hammerel asked what the average number <br /> of dogs kept at the kennel was. <br /> Brian Pulmer stated that the average is 60 because of <br /> the seasonal type business. <br /> City Attorney Malkerson stated that in this review it <br /> is implied that all the dogs will be kept inside but <br /> that the resolution doesnot addressthis. Malkerson <br /> stated that the Council may wish to add "all dogs must <br /> be kept inside" . Malkerson stated that the Council <br /> may wish to add that this conditional use permit is for <br /> one year only and automatically renewed if no problems <br /> arise. Malkerson stated that way Fulmers wouldn' t <br /> have to pay a fee but that way everyone is on notice that <br /> if things get out of hand that the next year they will be <br /> brought back in. <br /> Councilmember Hammerel moved, Councilmember Adams <br /> seconded, to approve Resolution #1654 , A Resolution <br /> Granting A Conditional Use Permit ancl Granting <br /> Variances to permit continued use and expansion of the <br /> boarding kennel and construction of a 96 ' x 122 ' <br /> commercial kennel structure on the residential <br /> property, subject to the addition that the maximum <br /> number of pets to be 150 and adding that the <br /> conditional use permit be reviewed in one year and if <br /> no problems it will automatically be rolled over, <br /> parking to be reviewed by staff , and add that all dogs <br /> must be kept inside at night. Motion, Ayes ( 3 ) , Nays <br /> (1 ) . Councilmember Frahm voted nay. <br /> Councilmember Frahm stated that he doesn ' t like the <br /> number of dogs and the piecemeal way of granting the <br /> conditional use permit. <br /> Discussion was continued about the residential unit <br /> above the kennel structure. <br /> Brian Fulmer stated that their intent is to have an <br /> apartment on the second f loor to have a single person <br /> live therefor security purposes. Fulmer stated that <br /> it wouZd never be a family but strictly for one person. <br /> Fulmer stated that the Planning Commission required <br /> the live-in person as a condition of their approval. <br />