07-09-1984 Council Minutes - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

MINUTES OF THE REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING HELD JULY 9, 1984. PAGE 4 #833 HARRY BROCROPP Councilmember Frahm moved, Mayor Butler seconded, to approve Resolution #1653 , A Resolution Granting a Variance to permit construction of a new residence, subject to Mr. Brockopp providing evidence to City staff that the access easement for the Soderman property has been filed in the chain of title prior to the granting of a building permit and prior to the variance going into effect, and the expense of the easement must be resolved between applicant and Soderman, and for the easement to be excluded from hardcover calculationsfor both properties (Soderman and Brockopp) . Motion, Ayes ( 4 ) , Nays ( 0 ) . #834 BRIAN FULMER 3505 WAYZATA BLVD CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT RESOLUTION �1654 Brian and Cathy Fulmer were present. Brian Fulmer stated that he would prefer to proceed with the review even without the tape. Brian Fulmer stated that it was his understanding that the Council wanted to place the limitations over the property with the square footage and not the number of dogs. Fulmer stated that some of the kennels are duplex kennels so it would be hard to specify a maximum number of dogs for the property. Councilmember Adams asked what the maximum number of pets would be for this 11 ,700 sf building. Brian Fulmer stated about 300 dogs could be kept in the building the way it is designed. Councilmember Frahm stated that he wanted a specific number of dogs allowed on the property. Mayor Butler suggested limiting the number of dogs according to state and federal regulations . City Attorney Malkerson stated that if the City removes the dog limit number, what will keep this from turning into a dog pound. Malkerson stated that the City needs control over the property and one way to do it is with limiting them to a maximum number of dogs . Mayor Butler moved, Councilmember Hammerel seconded, to approve Resolution #1654 , A Resolution Approving a Conditional Use Permit, subject to the addition that in no event the number of animals boarded may exceed 175. Motion, Ayes (2 ) , Nays (2 ) . Councilmembers Adams and Frahm voted nay. Motion failed. Councilmember Frahm stated that the residential unit has not been addressed yet and the number of pets it too high. Frahm stated that parking has not been addressed either.