05-30-1984 Council Minutes Board of Review

Home Browse Search

Page 2 1984 ORONO BOARD OF REVIEW MAY 3H, 1984 4 . Mrs. Sutterland , 4415 North Shore Drive 07-117-23 43 �1017 Mrs . Sutterland stated that the i984 valuation was increased $11 ,00(d over the 1983 market value . She stated that the house is in need of repairs such as a new roof and a new ceiling inside. 15 diseasedelmtreeshavebeenremoved . Mrs. Sutterland requested a revaivation of her property. No action by the Board . 5. Gerald Hansen, 3051 Farview Drive 04-117-23 33 PJ009 Mr . Hansen stated the 1984 market value placed on his property was $850 , 000 and he felt that this was too high. He stated that the property was built within the last two years , they can not see the lake from the house and he understood that the real estate market was not moving . He stated that neighboring properties are on the market and are not selling . Hilk stated that he would review the property with Mr . Hansen and show him sales information on � comparable property and he would like to review with Mr . Hansen the construction costs for the house . Mr . Hansen agreed to a revaluation. No action by the Board . Mr . Arlo Vande Vegte , Attorney represented 6. Galyes Marina, 3366 North Shore Drive 08-117-23 42 O�J�J3 and 08-117-23 41 P1P118 Mr . Vande Vegte stated that compared to Chaska Marina this property is valued too high. He requested that a revaluation be made on this property. No action by the Board . 7. Janet Aske, 1845 Lakeview Terrace 27-118-23 42 0016 Mr . Vande Vegte stated that his client was concerned about the steady increase in the market value. He requested that a revaluation be made on this property. No action by the Board . 8. Henry Klusterman, 4025 Dahl Road 07-117-23 14 0002 ' Mr . Klusterman requested that the 1984 market value be reduced to the purchaseprice. Hilkwillrevaluethisproperty. No action by the Board . 9. Eric Smith , 445 Brown Road South 03-117-23 31 0001 Mr . Smith stated he had no building permits taken out on his _. �- property and wondered if the Assessor ' s office was taking into -�', , consideration relief for storm damage. Hilk stated that his • property did not qualify for this type of relief because the � - � special storm damage relief is based on a percentage of the �� assessed value of the City. Mr . Smith requested a revaluation ,_ i , . '`;��•-� - of his property. No action by the Board .