Laserfiche WebLink
`�''� <br /> 5. The lakeshore on Browns 8ay to be included in <br /> the plat as outlot to be owned by Gregory & Duff . <br /> � , Appropriate conservation easement and dock <br /> and bouy limitation easement over outlot to City. <br /> 7 . City Attorney directed to bring back legal. <br /> opinion regarding liabi_lity of City for <br /> ownership , & public use of Molly' s Corner parking <br /> 1ot with understanding that the Molly' s Corner <br /> parking lot to be preserved by this action may in <br /> fact totally be eliminated . <br /> 8 . City to incorporate concept of gate , <br /> limitation of hou:s of use from 1�1 : �Jc� P.M. - � : �i�J <br /> A. M. enforcement of curfew, noise �nd littering <br /> ordinance as to Molly` s Corner Parking Lot . <br /> 9 . To accept the fair offer of Wm. Gregory to <br /> provide materials and/or funds to improve the <br /> parking areawith berms , plantingsorotheritems . <br /> City Attorney Malkerson - Your honor - A prior <br /> discussion that I believe was at the Planning <br /> Commission level at the Council level--------As <br /> my intent by �ahat I hear from the motion of Mr . <br /> Adams is tnat you after his first motion it is his <br /> intent that the City not have any rights over what <br /> is called outlot to city by contract either above <br /> the Gregory line or below the Duff line and as far <br /> as you are concerne�l , there are two issues there : <br /> l . You c�on' t want the city to l�ave any rights what <br /> so ever or 2 . You don ' t want any of this action as <br /> it relates to the subdivision or vacati.on in any <br /> way to effect what rights the city or county or <br /> public generally mayhave down there . Because as <br /> part of this we have a subdivision and if you want , <br /> that platted right of way here to be to the county <br /> is fine but if you want make sure that Gregory' s <br /> claim to this red area and �uf_f ' s claim to this red <br /> area as private property owners is enforced , is at <br /> its maximum whatever claim they may have wouid be <br /> to show that as nrobably an outlot that runs with <br /> DufL and with Gregory property as a seperate lot <br /> that they own and get the county to agree that the <br /> county has no governmental rights ever to allow <br /> the public generally to fish off of here . <br /> From my point of view and an important policy <br /> question I would like direction from you because <br /> it ties into the vacation and ties into the <br /> subdivision . Do you want the Duffs and the <br />