My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
04-11-1983 Council Minutes
Orono
>
City Council
>
1983
>
04-11-1983 Council Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/23/2015 3:07:26 PM
Creation date
4/23/2015 3:07:22 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
46
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
; �� <br /> Mrs . George Capp - They are real problems - where <br /> have you been the last hour and a half , Mr . Adams <br /> what is the difference between what we have been <br /> talking al�out and real problems! My God Man ! <br /> Since we have been joking around lets talk about <br /> the real problems , you have practiced now lets get <br /> down to the real ones , My God ! ! <br /> Ci.ty Administrator Benson - Your Honor I suggest <br /> you move to table this matter until April 25th . <br /> Councilman Grabek - Well anyway I still fail to <br /> see , if you tell me what purpose you see the <br /> property used for , maybe I could understand , but <br /> you tell me it is public access then , I asked you <br /> what is it public access to? <br /> Councilman Adams - I am tracking your logic , I <br /> understand . <br /> Mayor Butler - If there are no other comments then <br /> I will call for the question then on the motion <br /> which is to vacate the corner , the driveway area , <br /> which is to the south basically all of Brackett <br /> Avenue due to the liability exposure to the City. <br /> Councilman Frahm - Before you call that question I <br /> guess I would like to make one more comment . <br /> Mayor Butler - Go Ahead <br /> Councilman FraI�m - Again I will state that I would <br /> prefer doing that motion as Jim has said matter of <br /> fact , but there are some other factors , I don ' t <br /> see why we have to act on that vacation tonight. I <br /> don' t see why we can ' t , I don ' t understand ------- <br /> ----------------for the next three years , six <br /> months whatever it turns out to be ta table that <br /> motion and pass the subdivision without that . I <br /> think at least for me in three to six months it is <br /> going to be a very straight foward question asked , <br /> and I will not take the chance of the court <br /> ramifications that we will get otherwise . <br /> Councilman Adams - Does there not have to be a <br /> trade off for the subdivision? <br /> Councilman Frahm - I think we can easily work <br /> around it . <br /> Councilman Adams - Your subdivision just would ' t <br /> include the areas that has to be vacated . <br /> Larry Berg- Could you give us the subdivision <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.