Laserfiche WebLink
' Page 20 <br /> �OIL�ia�� ItGd.LiLL� TI14C�JiKR � �����i JKC �.�`"" R. c��k r r <br /> � A.rh A. Gmdnw P E. <br /> Orro G. Bonrinoo, l.E. Th�,Inas E. .\'n��tt P.E. <br /> /1 [� p Robarr W. Rouna,r.E. H��Amd H' Fm��� /.£. <br /> (� v <br /> Jouph C. Anderhk. I[. N•�hnr G. Sihrn�.hr /.E. <br /> Z33S ?d. 9....�.1� .�6 B.adla.d A. Lrn�be.a r.E Na.��n L Sonald P.E. <br /> 'A�"'! Ro6err D. Fn;m.d l£. l�..n�td C. Pu.farJ� r.E. <br /> �. n�..�, M.+wr�:o �SSII.� Rithard E. Tu�nti. l/ J.�.v A. B�urdae <br /> lamrr(�. Obon. /£ N...i. A. Hunson <br /> /��....� 612-636-k600 ��.�rn A/. Ownir. <br /> A�•�n A�. H�✓!Aa i E. <br /> !/i�.lrr A EnrA. � <br /> August 5 , i980 ,�., �, P�»�,,�, <br /> H�.lan .N. Oltnn <br /> Clty �f �2'�Il� I)a�id E. OLon <br /> Box 66 <br /> Crystal Bay, Mn. 55323 <br /> Attn: Mr. Richard Benson ` <br /> - Re: Fi le iJo 139�3 <br /> Minnetonka Bluff s, etc. <br /> 1980 Sanitary Sewer Improvement <br /> Dear Dick, <br /> Bids were received on the Minnetonka Bluffs, Ferndale Road, Oro-:o Lane, C� . <br /> Rd. 15 and North S'!'iore Drive Project on 11�esday, August 5, 198C. Tti:e fclle•a- <br /> ing is a �1!r.�ary of tne low bid received, the 2nd bid receive� a^� t�e ore'_i�- <br /> inary reocrt esti:n�te: <br /> Prelimi:�ary <br /> Report Low Bid 2�� P;d <br /> I. Minnetonka Bluffs $133,000.00 $200,192.50 ' $240,6;'? .71 <br /> IZ. Ferndale Road 14u,300.00 244 ,965.00 271,4�8 .45 <br /> III. Orono Lane 57 ,580.00 77 ,225.00 92,265.09 <br /> Tl^unk Sewer 76,400.00 ..52 ,900.00 u9 ,796.05 <br /> IV. County Road 15 40,000.00 43,881.50 46 ,790.74 <br /> V. North S'hore Drive 120,000.00 117 ,327.50 163 ,900.94 <br /> > TOTAL . . . . . . . . . . . . . $571,280.00 $736,491.50 $505,610.99 <br /> The low bidder did not^have a bid on the grinder pump station �1 which was a <br /> part of the North Shore Drive project. The loW bidder has also requested that <br /> he be released from his bid obligation because he alle�edly eiade a �95 ,000 <br /> error in preparing his bid. The low bid contractor has indicated tha� he <br /> would forfeit his bid bond of 5 percent before he would accept the project as <br /> bid. <br /> The bids received on the project are hiRh relative to the preliTi�ary report <br /> estimate. �e contractors obviously feel that the project is �c�: more diffi- <br /> cult than we anticipated at the time the preliminary report Was prepareu. We <br /> have discussed the pro,ject r+ith several contractors since the bids xere re- <br /> ceived and they indicated that the tight Working conditions an� r:sk invo.ved <br /> in the project because of the close proximity to the lake are What resulted in <br /> Page 1. <br /> 21a � <br />