Laserfiche WebLink
• . � C � �� � C Page 3 <br /> GRAY, PLANT, MOOTY, MOOTY NNETT D <br /> . �,��R 12 �� <br /> �+hAC1LD G.C/�NT�IBB7-If173) L.4W OFFICES PICHPqD /�.MOOAE,JP. <br /> n[np` K.�+LyERSTOCK11B9�'�97]) JaMES F.IANDE <br /> �_ S�E�'MEN J. SNYDC�+ <br /> rppNnlING. GAO� jOC% �OLNOKE EU�LDING /1'� JE<<REYJ. hEYES <br /> FFGNM v.'.PLLNT,JR, V OF pRpNp 6FVCE nPUGER <br /> �o�+� w. ^+oOTv MINNEAPOLIS, M�NNESOTA 554G2 �+ILL�<M t. ni�uOti <br /> N,EL�/�N F.MOOTY JOHN �.JFMES <br /> Rl.'SSELI M, [iENNE7T EIIZOBETH W. NORTON <br /> CI.INT ON A.SC H POEDEA T E L E.'�HO W E f612) 3?9-S 5 O� <br /> JO�'N Q.M SHANE <br /> ED""ARD J. C/+LLAMPN„1R. SVS/�N L.LENTZ <br /> JAM E: 5. S�N ONSON C�V iD R,nElLl' <br /> PI`.t+PRG N, �L�NT JO�+I�' E. 6ROM'ER <br /> � FLw�E LP t�. MERMLE <br /> MiCHPEL P. SUILiVAN <br /> T H G M A� D P R L I N G <br /> CUR?IS G. �ORSIVNC <br /> S�+ELDOr+ �. ��E.CN <br /> FICHhRD h. EOWMAN <br /> TH'�Jr.�pS J� PATIN <br /> 6aUC E C. G��'�Si tiG <br /> �ti.-.es a.vose <br /> C.�T E V E N W 1 L S O N <br /> 'D�ntiE NOLLERN <br /> J O H N �. C R O U C H <br /> TNUM.AS A. WILHELMV <br /> DnviD l. 6ENNETT � <br /> ..<viG . MOOTY <br /> EO�+Ir+ C. C h��'C NT ER <br /> EL�Z/�EETH M,SCHMIDT <br /> �iND�EY S. B vA��SON <br /> R�CtiAFiG A.HAGMETT <br /> J O M N W,T M I E� <br /> GEORGE w. 50UlE <br /> naOEL F �+.ULLEF .__ <br /> JEF�REY F. ERpOKE <br /> pGh'IEl A. �"ULM/�N (]o <br /> MICHOEL Fi. CUn'M1�NGHAN. March 11 � �7C.7o OF CO�NSEL <br /> F!a G A F W G.5 F L L:E N F C 5 E R T L. N E l L A N D <br /> Mr. Michael P. Gaffron <br /> City of Orono <br /> P .O. Box 66 <br /> Crystal Bay, MN . 55323 <br /> Dear Mr. Gaffron : <br /> I have the form letter from you of March 3, 1980 concerning <br /> the sewering of the North Shore Drive area. I had been hopeful <br /> that following the meeting of the homeowners the City Council <br /> would have felt that the general lack of enthusiasm displayed <br /> made a feasibility study a waste of money. However, I presume <br /> that my hopefulness was based more on laziness on my part than <br /> on reality since I did not bother to convey my thoughts to the <br /> City in writing following the meeting. Do not, however, feel <br /> bound to continue the study one moment longer on my account. <br /> For a larger number of reasons , I am not in favor of the proposal <br /> the City is studying. One of the reasons, at least, is that in <br /> your discussion at the meeting earlier this year I understood your <br /> conclusions to be that none of the 12 homeowners involved had <br /> "sewage treatment needs" which were not being adequately met at <br /> the present time or which you had any reason to believe would <br /> not be met in the foreseeable future by the present arrangments. <br /> So, even at a possible "less expense" , the opportunity to spend <br /> money for an unneeded item is not welcome. <br /> I do note from the flags and stakes placed on my property <br /> what is apparently the current route of the proposed project. <br /> Although one purpose of this letter is to express my opposition <br /> to the entire idea, I believe that i� would be desirable to <br /> have information concerning the feasibility and effects of running <br /> the sewer line along the road rather than on the interior route <br /> which you currently staked. Perhaps you could contact me or <br /> Nrs . Callahan (473-8149) and stop by some day soon to discuss <br /> this or other modified and alternate routes . The location of the <br /> present stakes is objectionable in any event. <br />