Laserfiche WebLink
� R��GULAR P4EETING OF THE ORONO CnUNCIL, JAr1UAP.Y 15 , 1980 Page 6 <br /> P4r. Bernard F.dstrorm, 190 Orono Orchard Road, CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT <br /> comPlained that the antenna heic�ht was not con- 280 nrono Orchard Road <br /> forming to a residential area. [4e are experiencinq (Continued) <br /> intolerable telephone interference. <br /> Councilmember Paurus: The Council' s concern is <br /> the interference and the intent of use of the <br /> antenna. <br /> Mr. Edstrom: I have had interf_erence from *�r. <br /> Petersen during mv telephone conversations. Tae <br /> contacted the telePhone companV. They installed <br /> a .filter but this was not eff_ective. <br /> Bruce r4alkerson: The FCC does not allow the Citv <br /> to interfere with Mr. Petersen' s FCC license. <br /> Federal law dictates regulations, not the City. <br /> Acting Mayor Massengale: '?'he Citv cannot denv <br /> use of the tower because of interference. <br /> Mr. Edstrom: �ahat can the City do for us? <br /> Acting P�iayor r4assengale: Safety and to�aer <br /> height can be controlled by the Citv. Interference <br /> has to be addressed to the FCC. If the FCC finds <br /> hirn in compliance, the City has no authorit�� �n <br /> these matters. <br /> P4r. Edstrorl: We feel our propert�� is exper�encinq <br /> a loss in value. <br /> Actinq r4ayor P�assengale: We will need documentation <br /> from youu determining diminution in values, rlow, <br /> we do not have that evidence. <br /> P�r. Dave nuay, 125 Smith Avenue: I am experiencing <br /> television interf_erence. <br /> Bruce Malkerson: The City does need testimon�� and <br /> evidence to support denial of the antenna. �7e do <br /> not have that. <br /> PZrs. Edstrom: [ae need your help now. <br /> Acting P�ayor Massengale: Mr. Petersen' s right to <br /> operate is controlled by the FCC. '_"he Cit�� neec�s <br /> affidavits from you documenting all of the pro�lems: <br /> 1. Interference <br /> 2. Safety concerns <br /> (Continued) <br />