Laserfiche WebLink
R�GULAR 22EETING OF TH� ORONO COUNCIL, JULY 24 , 1979 Page 13 <br /> Planning Comr.lission Pleeting - June 25, 1979 CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT <br /> � 3220 Navarre Lane <br /> ille Planning Conr►ission recomr,iends denial of the (Continued) <br /> conditional use permit application based on the <br /> following findings : <br /> 1. Area for parking is severely limited for this <br /> operation <br /> 2. Existing use is not compatible with a residential <br /> neighborhood � <br /> 3. Existing use in violation of the following <br /> ordinances: <br /> a) Ordinance 31. 101 - Pdon-conforr_iing use changed <br /> to another non-conforming use <br /> b) Ordinance 32 .210 - Certificate of Occupancy <br /> required for change of occupancy <br /> c) Ordinance 32 . 250 - Certificate of Occupanc_y <br /> required for non-conforming use <br /> d) Ordinance 34. 520 - Non-residential use prohibited • <br /> in LR-1C District <br /> In addition, the existing use of the building may <br /> be in violation of building and fire safety codes <br /> without structural changes to the building (i.e. <br /> ��indows and doors too close to property lines, firewalls <br /> inside, etc. ) <br /> Planning Comr.iission recomriends that the applicant be <br /> granted a grace period for cessation of the non-conforming <br /> uses subject to the following: <br /> l. As of May l, 1980, the property riust cease as a <br /> non-residential use. Property to revert to a <br /> residential use only, not office use <br /> 2. During grace period, all business activity to be <br /> conducted within the hours of 7: 00 A, l�, to 7: 00 P.M. � <br /> 3. Applicant must post a performance bond ($5, 000) in <br /> support of his good faith that he will be out by <br /> t4ay 1, 198� <br /> Zoning Administrator recommends adding the following <br /> for Council consideration: <br /> l. Limit personnel employed to present nur,iber <br /> 2. Parking allowed only on the northeast side of � <br /> building and along front line of building <br /> Staff Update - Alan Olson - June 29, 1979 <br /> If the existing use is to be phased out as stated by <br /> the applicant and as recommended bv the Planning <br /> Commission, then I concur that the� Council should <br /> deny the use, but stay enforcer.►ent of the denial. <br /> 2dote that Planning Cor.unission denied authorization for <br /> the requested office use after tiay, 1980. I recomr.lend <br /> Council make final action by Resolution, to include <br /> agreement sig.nature by the applicant. (ContinueD) <br />