Laserfiche WebLink
R�;GULAR MEETItJG OF THE ORONO COUNCIL, JULY 24 , 1979 Page 11 <br /> P4ayor Van Nest commented that the City has several SUBDIVISION/P.R.D. <br /> concerns that should be reviewed. These are: 3660 Shoreline Drive <br /> (Continued) <br /> 1. Flowage drainage easement <br /> 2. Homeowners Association to protect watershed <br /> and pond <br /> 3. Adherence to stormwater manager.lent plan <br /> 4. Outlot management <br /> 5. Move cul-de-sac to accommodate all units <br /> 6. 24 units or 12 two-unit townhouses <br /> 7. Each unit to have own yard <br /> 8. All units to be served internally with internal <br /> street <br /> 9. 15' easement on Blaine Avenue <br /> 10. All utilities and pond to be installed by developer <br /> 11. All assessments to be paid <br /> 12. Are we clustering townhouses to preserve open <br /> space or wetlands area? <br /> 13. Consider trail ownership and tot lot <br /> Mayor Van Nest moved, Hurr seconded, to table the <br /> subdivision/P.R.D, request of Hussman Investment Co. , <br /> 3660 Shoreline Drive, until the regular meeting of <br /> August 14 , 1979 to allow staff and applicant to <br /> consider these conditions. Motion, Ayes (4) - rdays (0) . <br /> Mr. Alan Olson, City Planner, entered into the record CONDITIOP7AL USE PERMIT <br /> the request for a conditional use permit of Richard 3220 Plavarre Lane <br /> Proudfit for 3220 Navarre Lane, dated r'iarch 5 , 1979 , #459 <br /> which states: Richard Proudfit <br /> P4r. Proudfit has asked to file an application seeking <br /> a conditional use permit for his light industrial <br /> use of the property located at 3220 Navarre Lane. <br /> He failed to do so in March, 1976 , when he purchased <br /> the property and has been in violation of the Zoning <br /> Code for the past two years. The applicant states <br /> that he was not aware of the effects of the discontinuance <br /> in the original non-conforming use and has only recent-ly <br /> been made aware of the zoning violation. He claims <br /> his operation has brought only good to the imr.mediate <br /> neighborhood, but the developers of Lafayette Ridge <br /> contend to differ. Staff has explained that an <br /> industrial use of land is not permitted in a residential <br /> district and that once Mr. Watschke' s auto renair <br /> business, a legal non-conforming use, ceased to exist, <br /> then that property could only be for residential use. <br /> Planning Comr.tission Meeting - March 12 , 1979 <br /> Planning Commission advised applicant that his application <br /> appears to be in violation of the Zoning Code. It was <br /> suggested that his application should be for rezoning. <br /> (Continued) <br />