Laserfiche WebLink
REGULAR P7EETING OF THE ORONO COUPJCIL, tJOVEPiBER 14 , 1978 Page 3 <br /> 41. North Shore Union is in the B-2 zone. REZONING & SUBDIVISION <br /> � 1960 Shoreline Drive <br /> 49. Refer to the Minutes of the September 25, 1978 (Continued) <br /> Planning Corunission meeting. <br /> 58. The resolution speaks for itself. The rezoning <br /> application has expedited the other matters. <br /> The boundary lines are dif�erent due to conflicting <br /> legal descriptions. I have a map with the <br /> different lines shown very clearly. <br /> I believe that the record,as established by this resolution, <br /> is clear. <br /> Staff Update - November 8, 1978 <br /> The matter was not heard at the October 26, 1978 meeting <br /> because only three Members were present. At that meeting, <br /> Mr. Reutiman promised to have plans submitted for <br /> the station improver.lents contemplated. The attached <br /> plans were delivered by Mr. Hornick on Nover,�ber 7, 1978. <br /> Plan Pdo. 1 - shows the existing station layout. Pop, <br /> candy and cigarettes were sold from vending <br /> machines. • <br /> Plan No. 2 - shows a proposed layout for convenience <br /> food store similar to application #418 <br /> which was withdrawn on Septeriber 11, 1978. <br /> This is a retail food sales use which is a <br /> new use for this property, requires a lot . <br /> area variance, parking variance, loading <br /> dock variance and setback variances for the <br /> B-1 zone, and is a use or change of use which <br /> would be prohibited in the LR-lA zone if this <br /> area is rezoned. This is the concept which <br /> caused lengthy review of the entire application. <br /> Plan No. 3 - shows a reduced version of Plan No. 2 but still <br /> includes food sales of milk, pop and frozen <br /> products. A car wash stall is shown as an <br /> addition to the existing services. <br /> Plan No. 4 - shows proposed parking (which may not be entirely <br /> acceptable) , curbing, fencing, underground fuel (?) <br /> storage and a pump island canopy. No landscaping <br /> areas are shown. The canopy design would be <br /> sir.iilar to the "Amoco" canopv on the attached <br /> drawing. <br /> To review my recor.unendations: <br /> l. The Council should adopt the fact-finding resolution <br /> to clear the record. <br /> (Continued) <br />