Laserfiche WebLink
REGULAR MEETING OF THE ORONO COUNCIL, AUGUST 29, 1978 Page 6 <br /> My recor.unendation is that the Planning Commission SUBDIVISION <br /> review this zoning discrepancy and that a rezoning 1960 Shoreline Drive <br /> application be required prior to final plat approval. (Continued) <br /> I recommend that all of proposed Lots 1 & 2 be <br /> zoned RR-1B with the station becoming legal- <br /> nonconforming or, if the B-1 district is to remain, <br /> that all of proposed Lot 2 be zoned B-l. <br /> Variances required: <br /> Lot l, if all zoned RR-1B: <br /> 34 . 842 Lot area required: 87, 120 sq. ft. <br /> proposed: 16, 000 sq. ft. <br /> variance : 71, 120 sq. ft. = 820 <br /> Lot width required: 200 ft. <br /> proposed: 104 ft. <br /> variance: 96 ft. = 480 <br /> Front setback required: 50 . 0 ft. <br /> " existing: 40. 7 ft. <br /> variance: 9. 3 ft. = 190 <br /> Side setback required: 30. 0 ft. <br /> proposed: 15. 3 ft. <br /> variance: 14. 7 ft. = 490 <br /> Lot 2 , if all zoned B-1: <br /> 35. 040 Lot area required: 20 , 000 sq. ft. <br /> proposed: 10, 875 sq. ft. <br /> variance: 9 , 125 sq. ft. = 46� <br /> Lot width required: 100. 00 ft. <br /> proposed: 139. 85 ft. <br /> variance: None <br /> Lot 2, if all zoned B-1: <br /> Rear setback required: 35. 0 ft. <br /> proposed: 5. 4 ft. <br /> variance: 29. 6 ft. = 85a <br /> Required vs Existing Landscaping: <br /> Front yard 20 ft. required - 0 ft. existing <br /> North side 15 ft. required - 2-5 ft. existing with screening <br /> Street side 10 ft. required - 0 ft. existing <br /> Rear yard 30 ft. required - 5. 4 ft. proposed � <br /> Psost of the variances are large percentage-wise, but <br /> it must be remer?tbered that this is an existing <br /> situation and is a lot line rearrangement meant to <br /> impxflve the existing situatis�n _ of having two <br /> structures and mixed occupancies on the same lots. <br /> (Continued) <br />