Laserfiche WebLink
, RWGpLAR PZEETING OF THE ORONO COtJP1CIL, AUGUST 15, 1978 Page 5 <br /> Planning Commission recommended approval of the SUBDIVISION <br /> preliminary subdivision subject to park dedication �1145 Watertown Road <br /> fee being paid, conservation and drainage easements, (Continued) <br /> and dedication of the Watertown Road right of way. <br /> Planning Commission deferred action on the variance <br /> proposal, requesting a more detailed survey and <br /> plan for the proposed house. <br /> Staff Note - August 7, 1978 <br /> Mr. Plank has subriitted a revised sketch of proposed <br /> Lot 2 showing the requested location of a 24 ' X 50 ' <br /> house. <br /> Front setback variance required: <br /> 34. 742 Required setback: 100 ft. <br /> Proposed setback: 75 ft. <br /> Variance: 25 ft. - 25� <br /> The house as located has a front line on a contour <br /> 6 ' below the road. If located at the 100 ft. setback, <br /> the front line would be 10 ft. below the road. The <br /> septic testing was done in a range of 6' to 14 ' <br /> below the road (959 to 951) ��hich indicates that <br /> a gravit_v s��steri could be installed with the house <br /> in the proposed location, but that a pumped syster.l <br /> would most likely be required if the setback require- <br /> ment was met. <br /> Council P4eeting - August 15, 1978 <br /> Pesek moved, Butler seconded, to approve the subdivision <br /> request of 2�iichael Plank, 4145 Watertown Road, per the <br /> Planning Commission recommendations of July 24, 1978, <br /> subject to conceptual approval of the variance until <br /> f inal plat approval. P'Iotion, Ayes (3) - Nays (0) . <br /> Mr. Alan Olson, City Planner, entered into the record VARIP,IVCE <br /> the following concerning a variance request of John 2208 Shadywood Road <br /> Proegler, 2208 Shadywood Road, dated July 17, 1978, #�407 <br /> which states: John Proegler <br /> The applicant is requesting a variance fror.i front <br /> yard and side yard setback requirements for con- <br /> struction of a new garage. The location is over <br /> the existing parking area and away from several <br /> eYisting trees. The existing non-conforming garage <br /> is intended to remain. The side setback proposed <br /> does rieet State building code requirements. <br /> (Continued) <br />