Laserfiche WebLink
, <br /> • <br /> , ItEGULAR MEETING OF THE ORONO COUNCIL, P�4AY 11, 1978 • Page 2 " <br /> The proposal consists of eight .building sites. SUBDIVISION - PRD <br /> Each is described on the plat, but only one of 780 Old Crystal Bay R. <br /> which (Lot 4) contains the required two acre (Continued) <br /> minimum lot area. Although the remaining seven <br /> lots consist of less than the required two acres, <br /> the total 16. 94 acres of dry area would provide <br /> the average minimum of two acres for each proposed <br /> site. <br /> Existing improvements, wetlands and easements on <br /> the original property restrict development � <br /> somewhat. (The location of the existing access <br /> road, the utility easement, the existing structures <br /> and wetlands. ) <br /> The applicant has not deducted the area required <br /> for the access road or 35 ft. utility easement. <br /> Deducting this total area might result in eliminating <br /> one building site. <br /> Lot 9 as proposed would be the responsibility of <br /> the association. Lot 9 consists of the access <br /> road, the setback areas between lots and the <br /> wetlands. <br /> After reviewing the proposal, we can direct the <br /> developer how to proceed. 64e will not be able <br /> to schedule a public hearing until all the � <br /> material as requested by the Planning Commission <br /> is submitted. This includes revised plans , if � <br /> necessary. <br /> I am enclosing the following exhibits which were <br /> submitted March 2, 1978: <br /> 1. Exhibit A - Subdivision application form <br /> 2. Exhibit B - Property description • <br /> 3. Exhibit C - Property owners list (neighbors) <br /> 4. Exhibit D - Copy of plat map including subject <br /> property <br /> 5. Exhibit E - Topographical map and survey of <br /> property and PRD division as proposed <br /> 6. Exhibit F - Map of proposed development in <br /> relation to surrounding developed properties <br /> Planning Commission - Sketch Plan Review - March 13, 1978 <br /> Planning Commission reviewed proposal. Two alternates <br /> were submitted (PRD and preliminary plat) . <br /> Developer requested some direction as to what design <br /> the Commission might prefer. He indicated a desire <br /> to utilize the existing road as an access to the <br /> other proposed building sites. <br /> (Continued) <br />