Laserfiche WebLink
r . <br /> ? CITY OF ORONO <br /> Regular t�eeting of the Orono Council, , 7: 00 P.M. <br /> April 13, 1978 <br /> The Orono Council met on the above date with <br /> the following menbers present: Mayor Van Nest, <br /> Councilmembers Butler, Paurus, and Pesek. Absent: <br /> Councilmember Massengale. Also present: City <br /> Administrator Benson, City Planner Olson, City <br /> Attorney rsalkerson, and City Engineer Olson. <br /> P�ayor Van Nest announced that now was the time PUBLIC HEARING <br /> and place for the Public Hearing regarding the 2060 & 2160 Wayzata <br /> rezoning of properties at 2060 and 2160 Wayzata Boulevard <br /> Boulevard. The City Administrator presented the Rezoning <br /> Notice of Public Hearing, the Affidavit of <br /> Publication and the Certificate of r4ailing. <br /> Since there were no comments from the public <br /> present, the public hearing was closed at 7: 02 P.M. <br /> Butler moved, Pesek seconded, to approve the P4INUTES <br /> Minutes of the Reqular D7eeting of March 16, 1978, March 16 , 1978 <br /> as anended. Motion, Ayes (4) - Nays (0) . <br /> Councilmember Paurus, representative to the Lake LP4LD REPORT <br /> DZinnetonka Conservation District, sta�ed that draft <br /> P]o. 12 of the Lat�CD Dpck Ordinance was presented <br /> at a public hearing held April 12, 1978. <br /> No Corunents from the Planning Commission. PLANNING COMMISSION <br /> Mr. Alan Olson, City Planner, entered into the VARIANCE <br /> record the following information concerning a 1225 Shoreline Drive <br /> variance request of N. C. P�4cDonald, 1225 Shore- #361 <br /> line Drive, dated P�arch 9 , 1978, which states: N.C. McDonald <br /> Applicant is requesting several variances to <br /> replace existing dwelling with new residence. <br /> The existing dwelling is currently non-conforming <br /> relative to lot area, lot width and setback <br /> requirements. The location is also in violation <br /> of our lakeshore setback requirement. In contrast <br /> to this violation, the newly proposed residence <br /> would meet the required 75 ft. lakeshore setback. <br /> The marsh area between the residence and road <br /> restricts access to the dwelling; however, an <br /> access drive has already been constructed some <br /> years ago to provide access to the existing <br /> dwelling. We should address the issue of access <br /> and instruct the applicant to use the existing <br /> drive rather than fill any more of the low area. (Continued) <br />