Laserfiche WebLink
' Rf;GvI.:�R ?`i,�'i I'::� OF �HE Oi:O?v0 COti?JCIL, i'L'�RCH 16 , 1978 Page 45 <br /> `Phe Planning Cor.lmission informed Tim Adams that VARIANCE - ZONING <br /> after obtaining direction on these issues fror.i 820 Brown Road North <br /> .he Council, the Co�;�mission would review the (Continued) <br /> proposal again conditioned on developer providing . <br /> the following additional rlaterial : <br /> 1. Location of all existing structures in r2ference <br /> to proposed lot lines so variances can be <br /> addressed <br /> 2. Private road detail (approved by City Engineer) <br /> 3. Should private access easement between Lots 19 & <br /> 21 be indicated on pZat or in title (approval <br /> of City Attorney) <br /> 4. Location of proposed fences on wetlands if <br /> variances are necessary <br /> P4er10 frorl Nank Muhich, Zoning Administrator, to Dick <br /> Benson, City �dl�inist?-ator, dated AZarch la, 1978 <br /> states : ' <br /> The Planning Corunission reviewed the above final <br /> plat at their regular r.ieeting of P'Iarch 13, 1978. <br /> The matter was tabled because many of the question- <br /> able issues require policy decisions which are not <br /> governed by ordinance. <br /> I am attaching a copy of the resur►e of Planning <br /> Corunission discussion and action on this proposal <br /> during the meeting. In the resur.te are listed the <br /> issues for which the Planning Commission is request- <br /> ing some legal and Council direction. <br /> The Corunission feels that answers to these questions <br /> are urgent before fozwarding a recommendation to <br /> Council. The Planning Commission is requesting <br /> we add this item to the Council agenda of Diarch 16 , <br /> 1�978 so they can have this direction before the <br /> next Planning Comr.iission meeting. <br /> At least one Coru�ission member will be present <br /> at the Council rieeting representing the Planning <br /> Commission. <br /> Council Meeting - l�7arch 16 , 1978 <br /> Mr. Jim Olson, City Engineer, reviewed his concerns <br /> as submitted in his rePort, which were: <br /> l. Private road - safety and erosion <br /> 2. Distinction between conservation and pasture <br /> easements - potentially hazardous to runoff <br /> 3. Assurance of adec�uate on-site systems on all <br /> lots - possible conflict with City' s position <br /> of no municipal sewering of this area . <br /> (Continued) <br />