Laserfiche WebLink
REGULI�R i�4EETI2IG OF THE ORONO COUNCIL, FEBRUARY 23 , 1978 Page 8 <br /> Mr. Alan Olson, Assistant Building & 7oning VARIANCE <br /> Administrator, entered into the record the 1565 Orchard Beach Place <br /> following information concerning a variance #345 <br /> for Arthur Heintz, 1565 Orchard Beach Place, Arthur. Heintz <br /> dated January 4, 1978, which states : <br /> This property is located in a LR-1B zoning <br /> district (1 acre - 140 ' lot width) . The <br /> dimensions of this parcel are approximately <br /> 80 ' � 100 ' (8, 000 sq. ft, area) . No survey has <br /> been submitted as yet. <br /> Lot variances required: <br /> 1. Area variance - 35, 560 sq. ft. <br /> 2. Lot width variance - 40 ft. <br /> Shoreline setback variances required: <br /> l. Structure within 75 ' of shoreline <br /> 2. Fiardcover within 75 ' of shoreline <br /> 3. Excess of 25o hardcover between 75' and <br /> 250' shoreline setbacks <br /> This property was previously occupied by a surruTier <br /> home which was destroyed by fire sor.me years ago. <br /> The owner has been unable to obtain additional <br /> land from adjoining properties. <br /> Parcel 5150 surrounding the subject parcel is <br /> also substandard (less than one acre) . The area <br /> is se��ered and this property has been assessed <br /> for sewer. The lot is currently occupied by <br /> an 18 ' X 12 ' accessory structure. <br /> Planning Commission - February 6, 1978 <br /> No representative present. <br /> Recommended denial for the following reasons: <br /> l. Degree of area variance that would be required <br /> (lot consists of less than 200 of required <br /> area) <br /> 2. Excessive number of variances necessary: . <br /> a. Shoreline setback <br /> b. Street or rear yard setback � <br /> c. Side yard setback <br /> d. Area <br /> e. Lot width <br /> f. Hardcover <br /> 3. Proposal is inconsistent with Comprehensive <br /> Guide Plan and Zoning Ordinance <br /> Planning Commission also suggested abatement of <br /> assessr.ments because property was incorrectly <br /> assessed. (Continued) <br />