Laserfiche WebLink
• m <br /> REGULAR I4EETING OF �FiE OROIJO COUNCIL, F�BRiJARY 23, 1978 Page 76 <br /> The �oning Administrator admitteci misinforming SUBDIVISION <br /> P�ir. Schneider that the combination was included 605 Stubbs Bay Road <br /> � the conditions set forth at the previous rleeting: (Continued) <br /> ihe Zoning Adr.ministrator misunderstood these <br /> directions and informed Mr. Schneider that this was <br /> an alternative. <br /> The Planning Cor�mission suggested tc�lo alternatives <br /> for another revised plat. <br /> l. Plat as submitted with additional 60 ' right-of-way <br /> along south lot line of the easterly lot to provide <br /> access from Stubbs Bay Road to the �aesterly lot to <br /> eliminate landlocking; or <br /> 2. Revised plat showing the easterlv lot as is, but <br /> include the south 40 acres as cortbined into one <br /> parcel with the westerly lot to eliminate land- I <br /> locking. . ' ' <br /> The Planning Commission initiated actio� to recommend <br /> approval. The Zoning Administrator interrupted to <br /> instr�:ct the Cortmission of the latest policy as <br /> interpreted by staff. Council action was to be <br /> deferred until such time that all 'conditions ��ere <br /> met so that Council resolution of approval of final <br /> plat would not include any unresolved conditions. <br /> 1'his proposal would not require final plat in mylar <br /> and hardshell forms as both lots meet the minimtun <br /> five acre area. <br /> Planning Comr.iission recomr,iended approval of the <br /> plat subject to the following conditions: <br /> l. Applicant subriit revised plat incorporating one . <br /> � of the alternatives suggested (survey) <br /> 2. City Attorney' s approval of current title opinion <br /> addressed to the City <br /> 3. City Engineer' s approval of plat including road <br /> easement and drainage and utility easements; and + <br /> easement docur.ient to be signed ( <br /> 4. Park dedication fee of $500 being �aid <br /> 5. �•�aive final plat (mylars and hardshells) <br /> Staff - February 7, 1978 <br /> I would like to suggest review of the 27 ' easement ' <br /> status. The 33' wide road to the west of the Bartig ? <br /> property is classified as a City right-of-way, I <br /> presurie through dedication. The 27' wide strip on <br /> the Bartig property would be considered an easerient. <br /> Should these be consistent? <br /> (Continued) <br /> � <br />